CCPortal
DOI10.5751/ES-10818-240227
Synthesizing plausible futures for biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe and Central Asia using scenario archetypes
Harrison, Paula A.1; Harmackova, Zuzana, V2; Karabulut, Armagan Aloe3; Brotons, Lluis4,5,6; Cantele, Matthew7,8; Claudet, Joachim9,10; Dunford, Robert W.11; Guisan, Antoine12,13; Holman, Ian P.14; Jacobs, Sander15; Kok, Kasper16; Lobanova, Anastasia17; Moran-Ordonez, Alejandra5; Pedde, Simona16; Rixen, Christian18,19; Santos-Martin, Fernando20; Schlaepfer, Martin A.21; Solidoro, Cosimo22,23; Sonrel, Anthony12; Hauck, Jennifer24
发表日期2019
ISSN1708-3087
卷号24期号:2
英文摘要

Scenarios are a useful tool to explore possible futures of social-ecological systems. The number of scenarios has increased dramatically over recent decades, with a large diversity in temporal and spatial scales, purposes, themes, development methods, and content. Scenario archetypes generically describe future developments and can be useful in meaningfully classifying scenarios, structuring and summarizing the overwhelming amount of information, and enabling scientific outputs to more effectively interface with decision-making frameworks. The Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) faced this challenge and used scenario archetypes in its assessment of future interactions between nature and society. We describe the use of scenario archetypes in the IPBES Regional Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Six scenario archetypes for the region are described in terms of their driver assumptions and impacts on nature (including biodiversity) and its contributions to people (including ecosystem services): business-as-usual, economic optimism, regional competition, regional sustainability, global sustainable development, and inequality. The analysis shows that trade-offs between nature's contributions to people are projected under different scenario archetypes. However, the means of resolving these trade-offs depend on differing political and societal value judgements within each scenario archetype. Scenarios that include proactive decision making on environmental issues, environmental management approaches that support multifunctionality, and mainstreaming environmental issues across sectors, are generally more successful in mitigating tradeoffs than isolated environmental policies. Furthermore, those scenario archetypes that focus on achieving a balanced supply of nature's contributions to people and that incorporate a diversity of values are estimated to achieve more policy goals and targets, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi targets. The scenario archetypes approach is shown to be helpful in supporting science-policy dialogue for proactive decision making that anticipates change, mitigates undesirable trade-offs, and fosters societal transformation in pursuit of sustainable development.


WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology
来源期刊ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/99500
作者单位1.Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster, England;
2.Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden;
3.DG Agr Res & Policies, TARM GIS & RS Ctr, Ankara, Turkey;
4.CREAF, Barcelona, Spain;
5.InForest Joint Res Unit CTFC CREAF, Solsona, Spain;
6.CSIC, Cerdanyola Del Valles, Spain;
7.Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria;
8.Univ Melbourne, Sch BioSci, Parkville, Vic, Australia;
9.PSL Univ Paris, Natl Ctr Sci Res, CRIOBE, Paris, France;
10.Lab Excellence CORAIL, Mloorea, French Polynesi, France;
11.Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, Oxon, England;
12.Univ Lausanne, Dept Ecol & Evolut, Lausanne, Switzerland;
13.Univ Lausanne, Inst Earth Surface Dynam, Lausanne, Switzerland;
14.Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Water Sci Inst, Cranfield, Beds, England;
15.Res Inst Nat & Forest INBO, Brussels, Belgium;
16.Wageningen Univ & Res, Soi1 Geog & Landscape Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands;
17.Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany;
18.Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland;
19.Inst Snow & Avalanche Res SLF, Davos, Switzerland;
20.Autonomous Univ Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, Madrid, Spain;
21.Univ Geneva, Inst Environm Sci, Geneva, Switzerland;
22.Natl Inst Oceanog & Expt Geophys OGS, Trieste, Italy;
23.Abdus Salam Int Ctr Theoret Phys ICTP, Trieste, Italy;
24.CoKnow Consulting Coproducing Knowledge Sustainab, Jesewitz, Germany
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Harrison, Paula A.,Harmackova, Zuzana, V,Karabulut, Armagan Aloe,et al. Synthesizing plausible futures for biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe and Central Asia using scenario archetypes[J],2019,24(2).
APA Harrison, Paula A..,Harmackova, Zuzana, V.,Karabulut, Armagan Aloe.,Brotons, Lluis.,Cantele, Matthew.,...&Hauck, Jennifer.(2019).Synthesizing plausible futures for biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe and Central Asia using scenario archetypes.ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY,24(2).
MLA Harrison, Paula A.,et al."Synthesizing plausible futures for biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe and Central Asia using scenario archetypes".ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY 24.2(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Harrison, Paula A.]的文章
[Harmackova, Zuzana, V]的文章
[Karabulut, Armagan Aloe]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Harrison, Paula A.]的文章
[Harmackova, Zuzana, V]的文章
[Karabulut, Armagan Aloe]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Harrison, Paula A.]的文章
[Harmackova, Zuzana, V]的文章
[Karabulut, Armagan Aloe]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。