气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.018
	Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
	Tamas, Peter A.; Delaney, Aogan; Crane, Todd; Hengeveld, Geerten M.
发表日期	2019-07-01
ISSN	1462-9011
EISSN	1873-6416
卷号	97 页码:78-80
英文摘要	As the international community increases investment in agricultural adaptation to climate change in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is increasing demand to extract generalized knowledge claims about vulnerability from individual studies. If
关键词	Reporting standards Systematic review Transparency Reuse Interdisciplinary research Socio-ecological systems Generalized knowledge claims Synthesis
学科领域	Environmental Sciences
语种	英语
WOS记录号	WOS:000470950000008
来源期刊	ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/83034
作者单位	Wageningen Univ, Biometris, Radix Bode 3,POB 16, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Tamas, Peter A.,Delaney, Aogan,Crane, Todd,et al. Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?[J],2019,97:78-80.
APA	Tamas, Peter A.,Delaney, Aogan,Crane, Todd,&Hengeveld, Geerten M..(2019).Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?.ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY,97,78-80.
MLA	Tamas, Peter A.,et al."Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?".ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY 97(2019):78-80.