CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s11367-015-1025-1
Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study
Frischknecht, Rolf1; Fantke, Peter2; Tschuemperlin, Laura1; Niero, Monia2; Anton, Assumpcio16; Bare, Jane3; Boulay, Anne-Marie4; Cherubini, Francesco5; Hauschild, Michael Z.2; Henderson, Andrew3; Levasseur, Annie4; McKone, Thomas E.6; Michelsen, Ottar7; Canals, Llorenc Mila i8; Pfister, Stephan9; Ridoutt, Brad10,15; Rosenbaum, Ralph K.11,12; Verones, Francesca; Vigon, Bruce13; Jolliet, Olivier14
发表日期2016-03-01
ISSN0948-3349
卷号21期号:3页码:429-442
英文摘要

The life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) guidance flagship project of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative aims at providing global guidance and building scientific consensus on environmental LCIA indicators. This paper presents the progress made since 2013, preliminary results obtained for each impact category and the description of a rice life cycle assessment (LCA) case study designed to test and compare LCIA indicators.


The effort has been focused in a first stage on impacts of global warming, fine particulate matter emissions, water use and land use, plus cross-cutting issues and LCA-based footprints. The paper reports the process and progress and specific results obtained in the different task forces (TFs). Additionally, a rice LCA case study common to all TF has been developed. Three distinctly different scenarios of producing and cooking rice have been defined and underlined with life cycle inventory data. These LCAs help testing impact category indicators which are being developed and/or selected in the harmonisation process. The rice LCA case study further helps to ensure the practicality of the finally recommended impact category indicators.


The global warming TF concludes that analysts should explore the sensitivity of LCA results to metrics other than GWP. The particulate matter TF attained initial guidance of how to include health effects from PM2.5 exposures consistently into LCIA. The biodiversity impacts of land use TF suggests to consider complementary metrics besides species richness for assessing biodiversity loss. The water use TF is evaluating two stress-based metrics, AWaRe and an alternative indicator by a stakeholder consultation. The cross-cutting issues TF agreed upon maintaining disability-adjusted life years (DALY) as endpoint unit for the safeguard subject "human health". The footprint TF defined main attributes that should characterise all footprint indicators. "Rice cultivation" and "cooking" stages of the rice LCA case study contribute most to the environmental impacts assessed.


The results of the TF will be documented in white papers and some published in scientific journals. These white papers represent the input for the Pellston workshop((TM)), taking place in Valencia, Spain, from 24 to 29 January 2016, where best practice, harmonised LCIA indicators and an update on the general LCIA framework will be discussed and agreed on. With the diversity in results and the multi-tier supply chains, the rice LCA case study is well suited to test candidate recommended indicators and to ensure their applicability in common LCA case studies.


英文关键词Footprint;Guidance;Impact indicators;LCIA;Life cycle impact assessment;Rice cultivation
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000370070200012
来源期刊INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61912
作者单位1.Treeze Ltd, Uster, Switzerland;
2.Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Engn Management, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark;
3.US EPA, Syst Anal Branch, Sustainable Technol Div, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA;
4.Polytech Montreal, Dept Chem Engn, CIRAIG, Montreal, PQ, Canada;
5.Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Ind Ecol Programme, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway;
6.Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA;
7.Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU Sustainabil, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway;
8.United Nations Environm Programme, Div Technol Ind & Econ, Paris, France;
9.ETHZ, Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland;
10.CSIRO, Private Bag 10, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia;
11.Irstea, UMR ITAP, ELSA Res Grp, 361 Rue JF Breton,5095, F-34196 Montpellier, France;
12.ELSA PACT, Ind Chair Environm & Social Sustainabil Assessmen, 361 Rue J Breton,5095, F-34196 Montpellier, France;
13.SETAC, Pensacola, FL USA;
14.Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Environm Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA;
15.Univ Free State, Dept Agr Econ, ZA-9300 Bloemfontein, South Africa;
16.IRTA, Inst Food & Agr Res & Technol, Barcelona, Spain
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Frischknecht, Rolf,Fantke, Peter,Tschuemperlin, Laura,et al. Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study[J]. 美国环保署,2016,21(3):429-442.
APA Frischknecht, Rolf.,Fantke, Peter.,Tschuemperlin, Laura.,Niero, Monia.,Anton, Assumpcio.,...&Jolliet, Olivier.(2016).Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT,21(3),429-442.
MLA Frischknecht, Rolf,et al."Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: progress and case study".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT 21.3(2016):429-442.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Frischknecht, Rolf]的文章
[Fantke, Peter]的文章
[Tschuemperlin, Laura]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Frischknecht, Rolf]的文章
[Fantke, Peter]的文章
[Tschuemperlin, Laura]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Frischknecht, Rolf]的文章
[Fantke, Peter]的文章
[Tschuemperlin, Laura]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。