CCPortal
DOI10.1080/03067319.2016.1221405
Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle
Creswell, Joel E.1,10; Carter, Annie2; Chen, Bin3; DeWild, John4; Fajon, Vesna5; Rattonetti, Anthony6; Saffari, Mark7; Tsui, Martin Tsz-Ki8; Zivkovic, Igor5; Braaten, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg9
发表日期2016-09-01
ISSN0306-7319
卷号96期号:11页码:1038-1047
英文摘要

U.S. EPA Method 1631 for total mercury (THg) analysis in water recommends that bromine monochloride (BrCl) be added to the original bottle in which the sample was collected, to draw into solution any Hg that may have adsorbed to the bottle walls. The method also allows for the removal of a subsample of water from the sample bottle for methylmercury (MeHg) analysis prior to adding BrCl. We have demonstrated that the removal of a subsample from the sample bottle prior to THg analysis can result in a positive concentration bias. The proposed mechanism for the bias is that 'excess' inorganic Hg, derived from the subsample that was removed from the bottle, adsorbs to the bottle walls and is then drawn into solution when BrCl is added. To test for this bias, we conducted an interlaboratory comparison study in which nine laboratories analysed water samples in fluorinated polyethylene (FLPE) bottles for THg after removing a subsample from the sample bottle, and analysed a replicate sample bottle from which no subsample was removed. We received seven complete data sets, or 63 unique sample pairs. The positive concentration bias between the bottles was significant when comparing all samples in aggregate (1.76 +/- 0.53 ng/L after subsample removal, 1.57 +/- 0.58 ng/L with no subsample removal, P < 0.05), however when comparing each of the three samples individually, the only significant bias was in the saline sample (Site UJ; 1.51 +/- 0.31 ng/L after subsample removal, 1.32 +/- 0.47 ng/L with no subsample removal, P < 0.05). Based on the findings presented here, we conclude that water chemistry, volume of water poured off, and the sample storage temperature explain some but not all of the observed bias, and we recommend collecting THg and MeHg samples in separate bottles whenever possible.


英文关键词Total mercury;sample preparation;analysis;interlaboratory comparison;oxidation method;bromine monochloride
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000384556600003
来源期刊INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61681
作者单位1.Brooks Rand Instruments, Seattle, WA 98107 USA;
2.Brooks Appl Labs, Bothell, WA USA;
3.PS Analyt Ltd, Orpington, England;
4.US Geol Survey, Middleton, WI USA;
5.Jozef Stefan Inst, Ljubljana, Slovenia;
6.San Francisco PUC, Southeast Lab, San Francisco, CA USA;
7.Environm Canada PYLET, Chem Sect, N Vancouver, BC, Canada;
8.Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Biol, Greensboro, NC USA;
9.Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, Oslo, Norway;
10.US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Washington, DC 20004 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Creswell, Joel E.,Carter, Annie,Chen, Bin,et al. Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle[J]. 美国环保署,2016,96(11):1038-1047.
APA Creswell, Joel E..,Carter, Annie.,Chen, Bin.,DeWild, John.,Fajon, Vesna.,...&Braaten, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg.(2016).Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY,96(11),1038-1047.
MLA Creswell, Joel E.,et al."Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 96.11(2016):1038-1047.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Creswell, Joel E.]的文章
[Carter, Annie]的文章
[Chen, Bin]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Creswell, Joel E.]的文章
[Carter, Annie]的文章
[Chen, Bin]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Creswell, Joel E.]的文章
[Carter, Annie]的文章
[Chen, Bin]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。