Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1080/03067319.2016.1221405 |
Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle | |
Creswell, Joel E.1,10; Carter, Annie2; Chen, Bin3; DeWild, John4; Fajon, Vesna5; Rattonetti, Anthony6; Saffari, Mark7; Tsui, Martin Tsz-Ki8; Zivkovic, Igor5; Braaten, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg9 | |
发表日期 | 2016-09-01 |
ISSN | 0306-7319 |
卷号 | 96期号:11页码:1038-1047 |
英文摘要 | U.S. EPA Method 1631 for total mercury (THg) analysis in water recommends that bromine monochloride (BrCl) be added to the original bottle in which the sample was collected, to draw into solution any Hg that may have adsorbed to the bottle walls. The method also allows for the removal of a subsample of water from the sample bottle for methylmercury (MeHg) analysis prior to adding BrCl. We have demonstrated that the removal of a subsample from the sample bottle prior to THg analysis can result in a positive concentration bias. The proposed mechanism for the bias is that 'excess' inorganic Hg, derived from the subsample that was removed from the bottle, adsorbs to the bottle walls and is then drawn into solution when BrCl is added. To test for this bias, we conducted an interlaboratory comparison study in which nine laboratories analysed water samples in fluorinated polyethylene (FLPE) bottles for THg after removing a subsample from the sample bottle, and analysed a replicate sample bottle from which no subsample was removed. We received seven complete data sets, or 63 unique sample pairs. The positive concentration bias between the bottles was significant when comparing all samples in aggregate (1.76 +/- 0.53 ng/L after subsample removal, 1.57 +/- 0.58 ng/L with no subsample removal, P < 0.05), however when comparing each of the three samples individually, the only significant bias was in the saline sample (Site UJ; 1.51 +/- 0.31 ng/L after subsample removal, 1.32 +/- 0.47 ng/L with no subsample removal, P < 0.05). Based on the findings presented here, we conclude that water chemistry, volume of water poured off, and the sample storage temperature explain some but not all of the observed bias, and we recommend collecting THg and MeHg samples in separate bottles whenever possible. |
英文关键词 | Total mercury;sample preparation;analysis;interlaboratory comparison;oxidation method;bromine monochloride |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000384556600003 |
来源期刊 | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61681 |
作者单位 | 1.Brooks Rand Instruments, Seattle, WA 98107 USA; 2.Brooks Appl Labs, Bothell, WA USA; 3.PS Analyt Ltd, Orpington, England; 4.US Geol Survey, Middleton, WI USA; 5.Jozef Stefan Inst, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 6.San Francisco PUC, Southeast Lab, San Francisco, CA USA; 7.Environm Canada PYLET, Chem Sect, N Vancouver, BC, Canada; 8.Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Dept Biol, Greensboro, NC USA; 9.Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, Oslo, Norway; 10.US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Washington, DC 20004 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Creswell, Joel E.,Carter, Annie,Chen, Bin,et al. Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle[J]. 美国环保署,2016,96(11):1038-1047. |
APA | Creswell, Joel E..,Carter, Annie.,Chen, Bin.,DeWild, John.,Fajon, Vesna.,...&Braaten, Hans Fredrik Veiteberg.(2016).Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY,96(11),1038-1047. |
MLA | Creswell, Joel E.,et al."Assessing bias in total mercury results after removing a subsample from the bottle".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY 96.11(2016):1038-1047. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。