CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.012
A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment
Meek, M. E. Bette1; Bolger, Michael2; Bus, James S.3; Christopher, John4; Conolly, Rory B.5; Lewis, R. Jeffrey6; Paolini, Gregory M.7; Schoeny, Rita8; Haber, Lynne T.9; Rosenstein, Amy B.10; Dourson, Michael L.9
发表日期2013-07-01
ISSN0273-2300
卷号66期号:2页码:234-240
英文摘要

The NRC report Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment made several recommendations to improve chemical risk assessment, with a focus on in-depth chronic dose-response assessments conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The recommendations addressed two broad elements: improving technical analysis and utility for decision making. To advance the discussions in the NRC report, in three multi-stakeholder workshops organized by the Alliance for Risk Assessment, available and evolving risk assessment methodologies were considered through the development and application of case studies. A key product was a framework (http://www.allianceforrisk.org/Workshop/Framework/ProblemFormulation.html) to guide risk assessors and managers to various dose-response assessment methods relevant to a range of decision contexts ranging from priority setting to full assessment, as illustrated by case studies. It is designed to facilitate selection of appropriate methodology for a variety of problem formulations and includes a variety of methods with supporting case studies, for areas flagged specifically by the NRC committee for consideration - e.g., susceptible sub-populations, population variability and background. The framewok contributes to organization and communication about methodologies for incorporating increasingly biologically informed and chemical specific knowledge into dose-response analysis, which is considered critical in evolving fit-for-purpose assessment to address relevant problem formulations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


英文关键词Mode of action;Fit-for-purpose;Problem formulation;Framework;Tier;Endogenous;Methods compendium
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000320632400007
来源期刊REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61332
作者单位1.Univ Ottawa, McLaughlin Ctr Populat Hlth Risk Assessment, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada;
2.US FDA, Ctr Food Safety & Appl Nutr, College Pk, MD 20740 USA;
3.Dow Chem Co USA, Toxicol & Environm Res & Consulting, Midland, MI 48674 USA;
4.Independent Consultant, Elk Grove, CA 95757 USA;
5.US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA;
6.ExxonMobil Biomed Sci, Annandale, NJ 08801 USA;
7.Risk Sci Int, Ottawa, ON K1N 7G2, Canada;
8.US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA;
9.Toxicol Excellence Risk Assessment, Cincinnati, OH 45211 USA;
10.Independent Consultant, Lexington, MA 02421 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Meek, M. E. Bette,Bolger, Michael,Bus, James S.,et al. A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment[J]. 美国环保署,2013,66(2):234-240.
APA Meek, M. E. Bette.,Bolger, Michael.,Bus, James S..,Christopher, John.,Conolly, Rory B..,...&Dourson, Michael L..(2013).A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment.REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY,66(2),234-240.
MLA Meek, M. E. Bette,et al."A framework for fit-for-purpose dose response assessment".REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY 66.2(2013):234-240.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Meek, M. E. Bette]的文章
[Bolger, Michael]的文章
[Bus, James S.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Meek, M. E. Bette]的文章
[Bolger, Michael]的文章
[Bus, James S.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Meek, M. E. Bette]的文章
[Bolger, Michael]的文章
[Bus, James S.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。