Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1039/c4em00560k |
Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types | |
McAlary, Todd1,3; Groenevelt, Hester1; Disher, Stephen2; Arnold, Jason2; Seethapathy, Suresh3; Sacco, Paolo4; Crump, Derrick5; Schumacher, Brian6; Hayes, Heidi2; Johnson, Paul7; Gorecki, Tadeusz3 | |
发表日期 | 2015 |
ISSN | 2050-7887 |
卷号 | 17期号:5页码:896-905 |
英文摘要 | This article describes laboratory testing of four passive diffusive samplers for assessing indoor air concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including SKC Ultra II, Radiello (R), Waterloo Membrane Sampler (WMS) and Automated Thermal Desorption (ATD) tubes with two different sorbents (Tenax TA and Carbopack B). The testing included 10 VOCs (including chlorinated ethenes, ethanes, and methanes, aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons), spanning a range of properties and including some compounds expected to pose challenges (naphthalene, methyl ethyl ketone). Tests were conducted at different temperatures (17 to 30 degrees C), relative humidities (30 to 90% RH), face velocities (0.014 to 0.41 ms(-1)), concentrations (1 to 100 parts per billion by volume [ppb(v)]) and sampling durations (1 to 7 days). The results show that all of the passive samplers provided data that met the success criteria (relative percent difference [RPD] <= 45% of active sample concentrations and coefficient of variation [COV] <= 30%) in the majority of cases, but some compounds were problematic for some samplers. The passive sampler uptake rates depend to varying degrees on the sampler, sorbent, target compounds and environmental conditions, so field calibration is advantageous for the highest levels of data quality. |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000354412100001 |
来源期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/61194 |
作者单位 | 1.Geosyntec Consultants Inc, Guelph, ON N1G 5G3, Canada; 2.Eurofins Air Tox Inc, Air Tox Ltd, Folsom, CA USA; 3.Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; 4.Fdn Salvatore Maugeri, Padua, Italy; 5.Cranfield Univ, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England; 6.US EPA, Las Vegas, NV 89193 USA; 7.Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | McAlary, Todd,Groenevelt, Hester,Disher, Stephen,et al. Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types[J]. 美国环保署,2015,17(5):896-905. |
APA | McAlary, Todd.,Groenevelt, Hester.,Disher, Stephen.,Arnold, Jason.,Seethapathy, Suresh.,...&Gorecki, Tadeusz.(2015).Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types.ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS,17(5),896-905. |
MLA | McAlary, Todd,et al."Passive sampling for volatile organic compounds in indoor air-controlled laboratory comparison of four sampler types".ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS 17.5(2015):896-905. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。