Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1021/acs.est.7b02337 |
Mode of Action (MOA) Assignment Classifications for Ecotoxicology: An Evaluation of Approaches | |
Kienzler, A.1; Barron, M. G.2; Belanger, S. E.3; Beasley, A.4; Embry, M. R.5 | |
发表日期 | 2017-09-05 |
ISSN | 0013-936X |
卷号 | 51期号:17页码:10203-10211 |
英文摘要 | The mode of toxic action (MOA) is recognized as a key determinant of chemical toxicity and as an alternative to chemical class-based predictive toxicity modeling. However, MOA classification has never been standardized in ecotoxicology, and a comprehensive comparison of classification tools and approaches has never been reported. Here we critically evaluate three MOA classification methodologies using an aquatic toxicity data set of 3448 chemicals, compare the approaches, and assess utility and limitations in screening and early tier assessments. The comparisons focused on three commonly used tools: Verhaar prediction of toxicity MOA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ASsessment Tool for Evaluating Risk (ASTER) QSAR (quantitative structure activity relationship) application, and the EPA Mode of Action and Toxicity (MOAtox) database. Of the 3448 MOAs predicted using the Verhaar scheme, 1165 were classified by ASTER, and 802 were available in MOAtox. Of the subset of 432 chemicals with MOA assignments for each of the three schemes, 42% had complete concordance in MOA classification, and there was no agreement for 7% of the chemicals. The research shows the potential for large differences in MOA classification between the five broad groups of the Verhaar scheme and the more mechanism-based assignments of ASTER and MOAtox. Harmonization of classification schemes is needed to use MOA classification in chemical hazard and risk assessment more broadly. |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000410255800084 |
来源期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/60860 |
作者单位 | 1.Joint Res Ctr, Directorate Hlth Consumers & Reference Mat F, Chem Safety & Alternat Methods F3, TP 126,Via E Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy; 2.US EPA, 1 Sabine Isl Dr, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 USA; 3.Procter & Gamble Co, Mason Business Ctr, 8700 S Mason Montgomery Rd, Mason, OH 45040 USA; 4.Dow Chem Co USA, TERC, 1803 Bldg, Midland, MI 48674 USA; 5.Hlth & Environm Sci Inst, Int Life Sci Inst, 1156 15th St NW,Suite 200, Washington, DC 20005 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kienzler, A.,Barron, M. G.,Belanger, S. E.,et al. Mode of Action (MOA) Assignment Classifications for Ecotoxicology: An Evaluation of Approaches[J]. 美国环保署,2017,51(17):10203-10211. |
APA | Kienzler, A.,Barron, M. G.,Belanger, S. E.,Beasley, A.,&Embry, M. R..(2017).Mode of Action (MOA) Assignment Classifications for Ecotoxicology: An Evaluation of Approaches.ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY,51(17),10203-10211. |
MLA | Kienzler, A.,et al."Mode of Action (MOA) Assignment Classifications for Ecotoxicology: An Evaluation of Approaches".ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 51.17(2017):10203-10211. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。