Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.025 |
Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N2O emissions mitigation? | |
Yuan, Yinghong1; Chen, Huaihai2,4,5; Yuan, Wenqiao3; Williams, David4; Walker, John T.5; Shi, Wei2 | |
发表日期 | 2017-10-01 |
ISSN | 0038-0717 |
卷号 | 113页码:14-25 |
英文摘要 | Land application of compost has been a promising remediation strategy for soil health and environmental quality, but substantial emissions of greenhouse gases, especially N2O, need to be controlled during making and using compost of high N-load wastes, such as chicken manure. Biochar as a bulking agent for composting has been proposed as a novel approach to solve this issue, due to large surface area and porosity, and thus high ion exchange and adsorption capacity. Here, we compared the impacts of biochar-chicken manure co-compost (BM) and chicken manure compost (M) on soil biological properties and processes in a 120-d microcosm experiment at the soil moisture of 60% water-filled pore space. Our results showed that BM and M addition significantly enhanced soil total C and N, inorganic and KCl-extractable organic N, microbial biomass C and N, cellulase enzyme activity, abundance of N2O-producing bacteria and fungi, and gas emissions of N2O and CO2. However, compared to the M treatment, BM significantly reduced soil CO2 and N2O emissions by 35% and 27%, respectively, over the experimental period. The N-15-N2O site preference, i.e., difference between 15N-N2O in the center position (delta N-15(alpha)) and the end position (delta N-15(beta)), was similar to 17 parts per thousand for M and similar to 26 parts per thousand for BM during the first week of incubation, suggesting that BM suppressed N2O from bacterial denitrification and/or nitrifier denitrification. This inference was well aligned with the observation that soil glucosaminidase activity and nirK gene abundance were lower in BM than M treatment. Further, soil peroxidase activity was greater in BM than M treatment, implying soil organic C was more stable in BM treatment. Our data demonstrated that the biochar-chicken manure co-compost could substantially reduce soil N2O emissions compared to chicken manure compost, via controls on soil organic C stabilization and the activities of microbial functional groups, especially bacterial denitrifiers. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
英文关键词 | Biochar;Compost;Nitrous oxide;N-15 site-preference;Enzyme activity;Bacterial denitrifier |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000407536200002 |
来源期刊 | SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/59933 |
作者单位 | 1.Nanchang Inst Technol, Inst Ecol & Environm Sci, Nanchang 330099, Jiangxi, Peoples R China; 2.North Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA; 3.North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA; 4.US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Environm Sci Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA; 5.US EPA, Air Pollut Prevent & Control Div, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Yuan, Yinghong,Chen, Huaihai,Yuan, Wenqiao,et al. Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N2O emissions mitigation?[J]. 美国环保署,2017,113:14-25. |
APA | Yuan, Yinghong,Chen, Huaihai,Yuan, Wenqiao,Williams, David,Walker, John T.,&Shi, Wei.(2017).Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N2O emissions mitigation?.SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY,113,14-25. |
MLA | Yuan, Yinghong,et al."Is biochar-manure co-compost a better solution for soil health improvement and N2O emissions mitigation?".SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY 113(2017):14-25. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。