Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.007 |
Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale | |
Loperfido, J. V.1; Noe, Gregory B.2; Jarnagin, S. Taylor3; Hogan, Dianna M.1 | |
发表日期 | 2014-11-27 |
ISSN | 0022-1694 |
卷号 | 519页码:2584-2595 |
英文摘要 | Urban stormwater runoff remains an important issue that causes local and regional-scale water quantity and quality issues. Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) have been widely used to mitigate runoff issues, traditionally in a centralized manner; however, problems associated with urban hydrology have remained. An emerging trend is implementation of BMPs in a distributed manner (multi-BMP treatment trains located on the landscape and integrated with urban design), but little catchment-scale performance of these systems have been reported to date. Here, stream hydrologic data (March, 2011September, 2012) are evaluated in four catchments located in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: one utilizing distributed stormwater BMPs, two utilizing centralized stormwater BMPs, and a forested catchment serving as a reference. Among urban catchments with similar land cover, geology and BMP design standards (i.e. 100-year event), but contrasting placement of stormwater BMPs, distributed BMPs resulted in: significantly greater estimated baseflow, a higher minimum precipitation threshold for stream response and maximum discharge increases, better maximum discharge control for small precipitation events, and reduced runoff volume during an extreme (1000-year) precipitation event compared to centralized BMPs. For all catchments, greater forest land cover and less impervious cover appeared to be more important drivers than stormwater BMP spatial pattern, and caused lower total, stormflow, and baseflow runoff volume; lower maximum discharge during typical precipitation events; and lower runoff volume during an extreme precipitation event. Analysis of hydrologic field data in this study suggests that both the spatial distribution of stormwater BMPs and land cover are important for management of urban stormwater runoff. In particular, catchment-wide application of distributed BMPs improved stream hydrology compared to centralized BMPs, but not enough to fully replicate forested catchment stream hydrology. Integrated planning of stormwater management, protected riparian buffers and forest land cover with suburban development in the distributed-BMP catchment enabled multi-purpose use of land that provided esthetic value and green-space, community gathering points, and wildlife habitat in addition to hydrologic stormwater treatment. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
英文关键词 | Stormwater best management practices;Low impact development;Distributed treatment systems;Urban hydrology;Land cover;Chesapeake Bay |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000347595000019 |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
![]() |
来源机构 | 美国环保署 |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/58149 |
作者单位 | 1.US Geol Survey, Eastern Geog Sci Ctr, Reston, VA 20192 USA; 2.US Geol Survey, Natl Res Program, Reston, VA 20192 USA; 3.US Environm Protect Agcy, ORD NERL ESD, Landscape Ecol Branch, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Loperfido, J. V.,Noe, Gregory B.,Jarnagin, S. Taylor,et al. Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale[J]. 美国环保署,2014,519:2584-2595. |
APA | Loperfido, J. V.,Noe, Gregory B.,Jarnagin, S. Taylor,&Hogan, Dianna M..(2014).Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale.JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY,519,2584-2595. |
MLA | Loperfido, J. V.,et al."Effects of distributed and centralized stormwater best management practices and land cover on urban stream hydrology at the catchment scale".JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY 519(2014):2584-2595. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。