CCPortal
DOI10.1039/c3em00486d
Evaluation of methods for analysis of lead in air particulates: an intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory comparison
Harrington, James M.1; Nelson, Clay M.2; Weber, Frank X.1; Bradham, Karen D.2; Levine, Keith E.1; Rice, Joann3
发表日期2014-02-01
ISSN2050-7887
卷号16期号:2页码:256-261
英文摘要

In 2008, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) set a new National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for lead in total suspended particulate matter (Pb-TSP) which called for significant decreases in the allowable limits. The Federal Reference Method (FRM) for Pb-TSP promulgated in 1978 prescribes analysis of Pb by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS), but the new limits approach the limits of quantitation of FAAS. On August 2, 2013, the USEPA finalized a new FRM for Pb-TSP. This new FRM describes two extraction methods and analysis by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The study described here was performed to evaluate the use of ICP-MS in the analysis of Pb-TSP for implementation of this new FRM. A multi-laboratory study of the new FRM demonstrated acceptable intra- and inter-laboratory precision and comparability for glass fiber, quartz, and PTFE filters, and acceptable accuracy for the analysis of three National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Materials (SRMs). A comparison was made between analytical results obtained using the 1978 FRM and those obtained using the new FRM. The results demonstrate that the ICP-MS method performs acceptably for the determination of Pb-TSP with lower limits of quantitation and strong inter- and intra-laboratory precision.


语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000331504100009
来源期刊ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS
来源机构美国环保署
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/57575
作者单位1.RTI Int, Trace Inorgan Dept, Environm & Ind Sci Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA;
2.US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA;
3.US EPA, Off Air Qual Planning & Stand, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Harrington, James M.,Nelson, Clay M.,Weber, Frank X.,et al. Evaluation of methods for analysis of lead in air particulates: an intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory comparison[J]. 美国环保署,2014,16(2):256-261.
APA Harrington, James M.,Nelson, Clay M.,Weber, Frank X.,Bradham, Karen D.,Levine, Keith E.,&Rice, Joann.(2014).Evaluation of methods for analysis of lead in air particulates: an intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory comparison.ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS,16(2),256-261.
MLA Harrington, James M.,et al."Evaluation of methods for analysis of lead in air particulates: an intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory comparison".ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS 16.2(2014):256-261.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Harrington, James M.]的文章
[Nelson, Clay M.]的文章
[Weber, Frank X.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Harrington, James M.]的文章
[Nelson, Clay M.]的文章
[Weber, Frank X.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Harrington, James M.]的文章
[Nelson, Clay M.]的文章
[Weber, Frank X.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。