Climate Change Data Portal
| DOI | 10.5751/ES-14850-290135 |
| How policy interventions influence burning to meet cultural and small-scale livelihood objectives | |
| 发表日期 | 2024 |
| ISSN | 1708-3087 |
| 起始页码 | 29 |
| 结束页码 | 1 |
| 卷号 | 29期号:1 |
| 英文摘要 | . Fire has cultural and economic significance for Indigenous and rural peoples worldwide, being used to manage landscapes for activities such as hunting, gathering, cropping, and forestry, and for ceremonial and spiritual purposes. Policy interventions by state and non-state organizations, such as regulations, economic incentives, and communication campaigns, can target fire use directly, or affect it indirectly, for example, by restricting land access. Yet evidence of such impacts has not been synthesized at the global scale. We analyzed 512 examples in 68 countries to describe the range of policy interventions by state and non-state organizations that target and/or affect fire use, categorizing interventions based on the broad actor types involved, their mode of operation (e.g., regulation) and their intentionality and/or possible effects vis-a-vis fire use. Of these interventions, 74% involved only state agencies in policy design and implementations, 4% involved only non-state organizations, and 18% involved collaboration between state and/or non-state organizations and/or communities. Three hundred and nine interventions directly targeted fire use, of which 87% aimed to eliminate or constrain fire use. Two hundred and three affected fire use indirectly, of which 88% led to reductions in or constraints upon fire use. Though there is some recognition in the 21st century of a need, in certain contexts, to support local fire use, for reasons related to environmental justice, ecology, wildfire risk and climate change, the literature we reviewed points to several challenges for contemporary efforts toward this end. These include contradictions between policy interventions, mistrust between actors following histories of fire suppression, greater fuel loads increasing the risk of burning where fire has been suppressed, and the need to consider the indirect effects of other types of policy, such as those related to land tenure. |
| 英文关键词 | fire use; global synthesis; livelihoods; participatory fire management; policy interventions |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| WOS类目 | Ecology ; Environmental Studies |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:001196070400001 |
| 来源期刊 | ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
 |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/303197 |
| 作者单位 | University of London; Royal Holloway University London; Lancaster University; University of London; King's College London; Imperial College London |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | . How policy interventions influence burning to meet cultural and small-scale livelihood objectives[J],2024,29(1). |
| APA | (2024).How policy interventions influence burning to meet cultural and small-scale livelihood objectives.ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY,29(1). |
| MLA | "How policy interventions influence burning to meet cultural and small-scale livelihood objectives".ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY 29.1(2024). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
