气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Potential distribution, observed impacts, and invasion risk of two non-native snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina and Macrochelys temminckii

CCPortal

DOI	10.1007/s10530-024-03356-9
	Potential distribution, observed impacts, and invasion risk of two non-native snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina and Macrochelys temminckii
	Nerozzi, Iacopo; Soto, Ismael; Vimercati, Giovanni; Capinha, Cesar; Tarkan, Ali Serhan; Kraus, Fred; Haubrock, Phillip J.; Pauwels, Olivier S. G.; Zuffi, Marco A. L.; Balzani, Paride
发表日期	2024
ISSN	1387-3547
EISSN	1573-1464
英文摘要	Among reptiles, turtles are the most frequently traded species and often released in the wild once they become unwanted as pets. The common snapping turtle Chelydra serpentina and the alligator snapping turtle Macrochelys temminckii are freshwater turtles native to North America. Although their trade is regulated in some countries, they have been introduced worldwide as pets. While C. serpentina has established some self-sustaining populations outside its native range, there are no such reports for M. temminckii. However, there are increasing records from the wild for both species, yet a thorough assessment of the potential climatic suitability, observed impacts, and potential invasiveness of these two species has never been performed. To fill this critical gap, we combined species distribution models under current and future climatic scenarios, standardized scoring impact systems (EICAT(+) and SEICAT), and invasiveness risk-screening (AS-ISK). Our results show current and future climatic suitability for both species outside their native range, especially for C. serpentina. In their native ranges, our models predicted a future increase in climatic suitability for C. serpentina, but a decrease for M. temminckii, raising potential concerns for the conservation of this latter species. Only C. serpentina could be assessed for its impacts, being attributed a minor impact score. The invasiveness risk screening attributed a medium risk to C. serpentina and a low risk to M. temminckii. In any case, our results suggest that data collection outside both species' native ranges is necessary to monitor the status of these as non-native species, identifying eventual reproductions in the wild and early detecting incipient invasions.
英文关键词	Biological invasions; Species distribution models; Potential distribution; Risk screening; Freshwater turtles; Reptiles
语种	英语
WOS研究方向	Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
WOS类目	Biodiversity Conservation ; Ecology
WOS记录号	WOS:001236802100001
来源期刊	BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/300799
作者单位	University of Bologna; University of South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice; University of Fribourg; Universidade de Lisboa; University of Lodz; Mugla Sitki Kocman University; University of Michigan System; University of Michigan; Senckenberg Gesellschaft fur Naturforschung (SGN); Gulf University for Science & Technology (GUST); Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences; University of Pisa
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Nerozzi, Iacopo,Soto, Ismael,Vimercati, Giovanni,et al. Potential distribution, observed impacts, and invasion risk of two non-native snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina and Macrochelys temminckii[J],2024.
APA	Nerozzi, Iacopo.,Soto, Ismael.,Vimercati, Giovanni.,Capinha, Cesar.,Tarkan, Ali Serhan.,...&Balzani, Paride.(2024).Potential distribution, observed impacts, and invasion risk of two non-native snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina and Macrochelys temminckii.BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS.
MLA	Nerozzi, Iacopo,et al."Potential distribution, observed impacts, and invasion risk of two non-native snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina and Macrochelys temminckii".BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS (2024).