Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.5194/hess-28-1191-2024 |
Deep learning for monthly rainfall-runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia | |
Clark, Stephanie R.; Lerat, Julien; Perraud, Jean-Michel; Fitch, Peter | |
发表日期 | 2024 |
ISSN | 1027-5606 |
EISSN | 1607-7938 |
起始页码 | 28 |
结束页码 | 5 |
卷号 | 28期号:5 |
英文摘要 | A deep learning model designed for time series predictions, the long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture, is regularly producing reliable results in local and regional rainfall-runoff applications around the world. Recent large-sample hydrology studies in North America and Europe have shown the LSTM model to successfully match conceptual model performance at a daily time step over hundreds of catchments. Here we investigate how these models perform in producing monthly runoff predictions in the relatively dry and variable conditions of the Australian continent. The monthly time step matches historic data availability and is also important for future water resources planning; however, it provides significantly smaller training datasets than daily time series. In this study, a continental-scale comparison of monthly deep learning (LSTM) predictions to conceptual rainfall-runoff (WAPABA model) predictions is performed on almost 500 catchments across Australia with performance results aggregated over a variety of catchment sizes, flow conditions, and hydrological record lengths. The study period covers a wet phase followed by a prolonged drought, introducing challenges for making predictions outside of known conditions - challenges that will intensify as climate change progresses. The results show that LSTM models matched or exceeded WAPABA prediction performance for more than two-thirds of the study catchments, the largest performance gains of LSTM versus WAPABA occurred in large catchments, the LSTMs struggled less to generalise than the WAPABA models (e.g. making predictions under new conditions), and catchments with few training observations due to the monthly time step did not demonstrate a clear benefit with either WAPABA or LSTM. |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS研究方向 | Geology ; Water Resources |
WOS类目 | Geosciences, Multidisciplinary ; Water Resources |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001190641300001 |
来源期刊 | HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/298628 |
作者单位 | Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO); Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Clark, Stephanie R.,Lerat, Julien,Perraud, Jean-Michel,et al. Deep learning for monthly rainfall-runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia[J],2024,28(5). |
APA | Clark, Stephanie R.,Lerat, Julien,Perraud, Jean-Michel,&Fitch, Peter.(2024).Deep learning for monthly rainfall-runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia.HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES,28(5). |
MLA | Clark, Stephanie R.,et al."Deep learning for monthly rainfall-runoff modelling: a large-sample comparison with conceptual models across Australia".HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES 28.5(2024). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。