Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141151 |
Blue or Green? Exploring Australian acceptance and beliefs about hydrogen production methods | |
Scovell, M.; Walton, A. | |
发表日期 | 2024 |
ISSN | 0959-6526 |
EISSN | 1879-1786 |
起始页码 | 444 |
卷号 | 444 |
英文摘要 | Large-scale hydrogen production will be required to provide sufficient hydrogen for planned applications. In Australia, and other countries, two main hydrogen productions methods have been proposed: hydrogen produced using renewables (green hydrogen) and hydrogen produced with fossil fuels and CCS (blue hydrogen). It is, to date, unclear how people think about the different attributes of these production methods and the extent to which the public's support for each approach influence downstream applications. Using an online survey instrument, this study explored how manipulating the hydrogen production method (green vs blue) influenced beliefs and public attitudes toward to production approach and various applications. The results revealed that beliefs differed depending on the production method presented but effect sizes were quite small overall. The effect was, however, more pronounced with those who more strongly endorse an environmental preservation attitude. The findings, overall, suggest that there is slightly stronger support for green hydrogen production, which is informed by the beliefs that blue hydrogen is a replaceable technology, will conflict with renewable electricity production and will have negative environmental impacts. The research emphasizes the importance of researchers and industry to show that blue hydrogen is a viable long-term option that will compliment, not conflict with, renewable electricity production. Additionally, the findings suggest that blue hydrogen projects will gain stronger support if they can demonstrate minimal local environmental impacts and limited carbon emissions. |
英文关键词 | Hydrogen production; Hydrogen applications; Hydrogen attributes; Beliefs; Acceptance; Environmental attitude |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
WOS类目 | Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001200135300001 |
来源期刊 | JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/297496 |
作者单位 | Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Scovell, M.,Walton, A.. Blue or Green? Exploring Australian acceptance and beliefs about hydrogen production methods[J],2024,444. |
APA | Scovell, M.,&Walton, A..(2024).Blue or Green? Exploring Australian acceptance and beliefs about hydrogen production methods.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,444. |
MLA | Scovell, M.,et al."Blue or Green? Exploring Australian acceptance and beliefs about hydrogen production methods".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 444(2024). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Scovell, M.]的文章 |
[Walton, A.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Scovell, M.]的文章 |
[Walton, A.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Scovell, M.]的文章 |
[Walton, A.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。