Climate Change Data Portal
| DOI | 10.1038/s41558-024-01960-0 |
| Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions | |
| 发表日期 | 2024 |
| ISSN | 1758-678X |
| EISSN | 1758-6798 |
| 起始页码 | 14 |
| 结束页码 | 4 |
| 卷号 | 14期号:4 |
| 英文摘要 | Viable nature-based climate solutions (NbCS) are needed to achieve climate goals expressed in international agreements like the Paris Accord. Many NbCS pathways have strong scientific foundations and can deliver meaningful climate benefits but effective mitigation is undermined by pathways with less scientific certainty. Here we couple an extensive literature review with an expert elicitation on 43 pathways and find that at present the most used pathways, such as tropical forest conservation, have a solid scientific basis for mitigation. However, the experts suggested that some pathways, many with carbon credit eligibility and market activity, remain uncertain in terms of their climate mitigation efficacy. Sources of uncertainty include incomplete GHG measurement and accounting. We recommend focusing on resolving those uncertainties before broadly scaling implementation of those pathways in quantitative emission or sequestration mitigation plans. If appropriate, those pathways should be supported for their cobenefits, such as biodiversity and food security. Nature-based climate solutions are widely incorporated into climate change mitigation plans and need firm scientific foundations. Through literature review and expert elicitation, this analysis shows that for some major pathways there is strong support, while for others their efficacy remains uncertain. |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
| WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:001190197500001 |
| 来源期刊 | NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
 |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/293281 |
| 作者单位 | Environmental Defense Fund; University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Denver; State University System of Florida; University of Florida; Resources for the Future; University of Alaska System; University of Alaska Fairbanks; Columbia University; Columbia University; Nature Conservancy; University of Exeter; Sorbonne Universite; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universite Paris Saclay; Institut Polytechnique de Paris; Ecole Polytechnique; Universite Paris Cite; Universite PSL; Carnegie Mellon University; Indiana University System; Indiana University Bloomington; University of California System; University of California Davis; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; University of Wisconsin System; University of Wisconsin Madison; National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA); NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; University System of Maryland; University of Maryland College Park; University of Montana System; University of Montana |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | . Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions[J],2024,14(4). |
| APA | (2024).Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions.NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE,14(4). |
| MLA | "Expert review of the science underlying nature-based climate solutions".NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE 14.4(2024). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
