CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140677
Evaluating biomass sustainability: Why below-ground carbon sequestration matters
Forfora, Naycari; Azuaje, Ivana; Vivas, Keren A.; Vera, Ramon E.; Brito, Amelys; Venditti, Richard; Kelley, Stephen; Tu, Qingshi; Woodley, Alex; Gonzalez, Ronalds
发表日期2024
ISSN0959-6526
EISSN1879-1786
起始页码439
卷号439
英文摘要Biomass, as a raw material, has been identified as a crucial component of decarbonization strategies to mitigate climate change. Decisions on which biomass should be targeted for different purposes are dependent on variables such as availability, chemical composition, and sustainability. Consumer perception often positions non-wood sources, such as bamboo, as environmentally preferable feedstocks for fiber-based product production. Yet, this perceived environmental benefit lacks robust scientific substantiation and standardized methodologies. This study addresses this gap by conducting a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of twelve biomass production systems encompassing tree plantations, dedicated crops, and agricultural residues for energy and bioproducts manufacture. The evaluated feedstocks include southern softwood, wheat straw, rice straw, rice husk, hemp hurd, sugarcane bagasse, switchgrass, biomass sorghum (United States), eucalyptus (Brazil), bamboo (China), and northern softwood (Canada). Incorporating a critical yet often overlooked factor, this LCA integrates the potential soil organic carbon sequestration (SOC) via below-ground biomass for each biomass type. This consideration significantly alters the estimated carbon intensity per ton of feedstock, potentially reshaping sustainability perceptions as certain systems emerge as carbon sinks. From a cradle-to-farm gate perspective, the assessed global warming potential for biomass production spans 12-245 kg CO2eq per oven -dry ton (ODt), factoring only anthropogenic emissions. However, when accounting for SOC sequestration, the range shifts to -170 to 228 kg CO2eq per ODt, highlighting the potential role of biomass to act as carbon sink systems. By illuminating the dynamic influence of SOC sequestration, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of biomass-related carbon emissions, shedding light on pathways to mitigate environmental impact.
英文关键词Life cycle assessment; Biomass production; Soil organic carbon sequestration; Carbon footprint; Net zero emissions
语种英语
WOS研究方向Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
WOS类目Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences
WOS记录号WOS:001172750700001
来源期刊JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/289576
作者单位North Carolina State University; University of British Columbia; North Carolina State University
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Forfora, Naycari,Azuaje, Ivana,Vivas, Keren A.,et al. Evaluating biomass sustainability: Why below-ground carbon sequestration matters[J],2024,439.
APA Forfora, Naycari.,Azuaje, Ivana.,Vivas, Keren A..,Vera, Ramon E..,Brito, Amelys.,...&Gonzalez, Ronalds.(2024).Evaluating biomass sustainability: Why below-ground carbon sequestration matters.JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,439.
MLA Forfora, Naycari,et al."Evaluating biomass sustainability: Why below-ground carbon sequestration matters".JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 439(2024).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Forfora, Naycari]的文章
[Azuaje, Ivana]的文章
[Vivas, Keren A.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Forfora, Naycari]的文章
[Azuaje, Ivana]的文章
[Vivas, Keren A.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Forfora, Naycari]的文章
[Azuaje, Ivana]的文章
[Vivas, Keren A.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。