气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): The interspecific growth–mortality trade-off is not a general framework for tropical forest community structure

CCPortal

DOI	10.1038/s41559-020-01340-9
	The interspecific growth–mortality trade-off is not a general framework for tropical forest community structure
	Russo S.E.; McMahon S.M.; Detto M.; Ledder G.; Wright S.J.; Condit R.S.; Davies S.J.; Ashton P.S.; Bunyavejchewin S.; Chang-Yang C.-H.; Ediriweera S.; Ewango C.E.N.; Fletcher C.; Foster R.B.; Gunatilleke C.V.S.; Gunatilleke I.A.U.N.; Hart T.; Hsieh C.-F.; Hubbell S.P.; Itoh A.; Kassim A.R.; Leong Y.T.; Lin Y.C.; Makana J.-R.; Mohamad M.B.; Ong P.; Sugiyama A.; Sun I.-F.; Tan S.; Thompson J.; Yamakura T.; Yap S.L.; Zimmerman J.K.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	2397-334X
起始页码	174
结束页码	183
卷号	5 期号:2
英文摘要	Resource allocation within trees is a zero-sum game. Unavoidable trade-offs dictate that allocation to growth-promoting functions curtails other functions, generating a gradient of investment in growth versus survival along which tree species align, known as the interspecific growth–mortality trade-off. This paradigm is widely accepted but not well established. Using demographic data for 1,111 tree species across ten tropical forests, we tested the generality of the growth–mortality trade-off and evaluated its underlying drivers using two species-specific parameters describing resource allocation strategies: tolerance of resource limitation and responsiveness of allocation to resource access. Globally, a canonical growth–mortality trade-off emerged, but the trade-off was strongly observed only in less disturbance-prone forests, which contained diverse resource allocation strategies. Only half of disturbance-prone forests, which lacked tolerant species, exhibited the trade-off. Supported by a theoretical model, our findings raise questions about whether the growth–mortality trade-off is a universally applicable organizing framework for understanding tropical forest community structure. ? 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	forest; species difference; tree; tropic climate; Forests; Species Specificity; Trees; Tropical Climate
来源期刊	Nature Ecology & Evolution
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/257033
作者单位	School of Biological Science and Center for Plant Science Innovation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, United States; Center for Tropical Forest Science—Forest Global Earth Observatory, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, DC, United States; Forest Ecology Group, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, United States; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States; Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, United States; Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, United States; Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States; Research Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan; Department of Science and Technology, Uva Wellassa University, Badulla, Sri Lanka; Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources Management & Faculty of Sciences, University...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Russo S.E.,McMahon S.M.,Detto M.,等. The interspecific growth–mortality trade-off is not a general framework for tropical forest community structure[J],2021,5(2).
APA	Russo S.E..,McMahon S.M..,Detto M..,Ledder G..,Wright S.J..,...&Zimmerman J.K..(2021).The interspecific growth–mortality trade-off is not a general framework for tropical forest community structure.Nature Ecology & Evolution,5(2).
MLA	Russo S.E.,et al."The interspecific growth–mortality trade-off is not a general framework for tropical forest community structure".Nature Ecology & Evolution 5.2(2021).