Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112821 |
Risk-adjusted preferences of utility companies and institutional investors for battery storage and green hydrogen investment | |
Côté E.; Salm S. | |
发表日期 | 2022 |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
卷号 | 163 |
英文摘要 | Achieving climate-neutrality requires considerable investment in energy storage systems (ESS) to integrate variable renewable energy sources into the grid. However, investments into ESS are often unprofitable, in particular for grid-scale battery storage and green hydrogen technologies, prompting many actors to call for policy intervention. This study investigates investor-specific risk-return preferences for ESS investment and derives policy recommendations. Insights are drawn from 1,605 experimental investment-related decisions obtained from 42 high-level institutional investors and utility representatives. Results reveal that both investor groups view revenue stacking as key to making ESS investment viable. While the expected return on investment is the most important project characteristic, risk-return preferences for other features diverge between groups. Institutional investors appear more open to exploring new technological ventures (20% of utility respondents would not consider making investments into solar photovoltaic-hydrogen), whereas utilities seem to prefer greenfield projects (23% of surveyed institutional investors rejected such projects). Interestingly, both groups show strong aversion towards energy market price risk. Institutional investors require a premium of 6.87 percentage points and utilities 5.54 percentage points for moving from a position of fully hedged against market price risk to a scenario where only 20% of revenue is fixed, underlining the need for policy support. © 2022 The Authors |
英文关键词 | Choice experiment; Energy policy; Energy storage; Green hydrogen; Grid-scale battery; Investment decision |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Battery storage; Commerce; Electric batteries; Energy policy; Hydrogen storage; Renewable energy resources; Risk perception; Solar power generation; Battery storage; Choice experiments; Green hydrogen; Grid scale; Grid-scale battery; Institutional investors; Investment decisions; Market price; Price risks; Storage systems; Investments; decision making; discrete choice analysis; energy policy; fuel cell; hydrogen; institutional framework; investment |
来源期刊 | Energy Policy
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/256323 |
作者单位 | University of St.Gallen, Institute for Economy and the Environment (IWÖ-HSG), Müller-Friedberg-Str. 6/8, St. Gallen, CH-9000, Switzerland; Allianz Investment Management SE, Königinstrasse 28, Munich, D-80802, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Côté E.,Salm S.. Risk-adjusted preferences of utility companies and institutional investors for battery storage and green hydrogen investment[J],2022,163. |
APA | Côté E.,&Salm S..(2022).Risk-adjusted preferences of utility companies and institutional investors for battery storage and green hydrogen investment.Energy Policy,163. |
MLA | Côté E.,et al."Risk-adjusted preferences of utility companies and institutional investors for battery storage and green hydrogen investment".Energy Policy 163(2022). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Côté E.]的文章 |
[Salm S.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Côté E.]的文章 |
[Salm S.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Côté E.]的文章 |
[Salm S.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。