Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112826 |
Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China | |
Gu G.; Zheng H.; Tong L.; Dai Y. | |
发表日期 | 2022 |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
卷号 | 163 |
英文摘要 | Based on the panel data of prefecture-level and above cities in China, this paper uses a combination of Difference-in-Difference and trajectory balancing methods to investigate the energy conservation and emission reduction effects of the carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool. The results reveal that: (1) The energy consumption per unit of Gross Domestic Product experienced a significant decline after the implementation of carbon emission trading market policy in 2013. The carbon market policy has continuous positive effects on energy conservation and emission reduction. (2) There was no significant difference in energy consumption per unit of Gross Domestic Product in pilot cities and non-pilot cities before the implementation of the carbon emission trading policy. (3) Through the specific analysis of each pilot city via trajectory balancing method, all pilot areas produced energy conservation and emission reduction effects to different degrees. The energy conservation and emission reduction effects in Tianjin and Chongqing after the policy implementation were particularly obvious. Finally, we propose that China should adhere to the carbon trading policy of "market decision and government regulation", speed up the construction of carbon financial market, implement relevant policies according to regional differences, speed up the adjustment of regional industrial structure and improve the technological innovation ability of enterprises. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd |
英文关键词 | Carbon financial market; Difference-in-Difference; Energy conservation and emission reduction effects; Trading policy; Trajectory balancing |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Carbon; Emission control; Energy conservation; Energy policy; Energy utilization; Environmental regulations; Financial markets; Carbon financial market; Difference-in-differences; Differences-in-differences; Energy conservation and emission reduction effect; Energy conservation and emission reductions; Pilot city; Policy tools; Reduction effects; Trading policy; Trajectory balancing; Trajectories; carbon; emission control; emissions trading; energy conservation; environmental economics; environmental policy; financial market; Gross Domestic Product; regulatory framework; China; Chongqing; Tianjin |
来源期刊 | Energy Policy |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/256312 |
作者单位 | Faculty of Economics and Management, Zhejiang A&F University, Yijin St, Lin'an, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 311300, China; Zhejiang Province Key Cultivating Think Tank—Research Academy for Rural Revitalization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang A&F University, Yijin St, Lin'an, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 311300, China; Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Zhejiang A&F University, Yijin St, Lin'an, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 311300, China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Gu G.,Zheng H.,Tong L.,et al. Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China[J],2022,163. |
APA | Gu G.,Zheng H.,Tong L.,&Dai Y..(2022).Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China.Energy Policy,163. |
MLA | Gu G.,et al."Does carbon financial market as an environmental regulation policy tool promote regional energy conservation and emission reduction? Empirical evidence from China".Energy Policy 163(2022). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Gu G.]的文章 |
[Zheng H.]的文章 |
[Tong L.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Gu G.]的文章 |
[Zheng H.]的文章 |
[Tong L.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Gu G.]的文章 |
[Zheng H.]的文章 |
[Tong L.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。