Climate Change Data Portal
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.679 |
| Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change | |
| Robertson S. | |
| 发表日期 | 2021 |
| ISSN | 1757-7780 |
| 卷号 | 12期号:1 |
| 英文摘要 | Following the trenchant criticism of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report concerning the lack of transparency in integrated assessment models (IAMs), much attention has been given to addressing this issue in the preparation of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). The issue of IAM transparency has been an ongoing concern for approximately two decades regarding the cloaking of value-laden assumptions and output uncertainties. Due to the opaque nature of IAMs, the credibility of modeling results and the associated policy recommendations are patently limited, with policymakers inevitably having reservations as to the robustness of modeling outcomes given the deficit of information regarding the underlying assumptions. In an attempt to address the issue of a lack of transparency concerning IAM usage by the IPCC, a database containing the climate mitigation scenario ensemble which underpinned the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C was made publicly available, the IAMC 1.5°C Scenario Explorer database. Despite this database, the omission of critical model input data and accompanying supporting documentation from its content fails to fulfill its raison d'être, that is to say, to ensure reproducibility and transparency. If the issue of IAM transparency is not fully addressed in the upcoming AR6 with respect to the provision of IAM input data, accompanied by supporting documentation, then the IPCC will have failed to meet its own declared commitment for this assessment cycle. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Assessment Modeling. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. |
| 关键词 | integrated assessment modelsIPCCSixth Assessment Reporttransparencytrust |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| scopus关键词 | Database systems; Global warming; Input output programs; Transparency; Climate mitigations; Ethical considerations; Integrated assessment; Integrated assessment models; Intergovernmental panel on climate changes; Policy recommendations; Robustness of model; Valueladen assumptions; Climate models; database; ethics; integrated approach; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; modeling; policy approach; policy making |
| 来源期刊 | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
 |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/249678 |
| 作者单位 | Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, School of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Robertson S.. Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[J],2021,12(1). |
| APA | Robertson S..(2021).Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,12(1). |
| MLA | Robertson S.."Transparency, trust, and integrated assessment models: An ethical consideration for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change".Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 12.1(2021). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Robertson S.]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Robertson S.]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Robertson S.]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
