气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): The ‘co’ in co-production of climate action: Challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102445
	The ‘co’ in co-production of climate action: Challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice
	Howarth C.; Lane M.; Morse-Jones S.; Brooks K.; Viner D.
发表日期	2022
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	72
英文摘要	Effective action taken against climate change must find ways to unite scientific and practice-based knowledges associated with the various stakeholders who see themselves as invested in the global delivery of climate governance. Political decision-makers, climate scientists and practitioners approach this challenge from what are often radically different perspectives and experiences. While considerable work has been done to develop the idea of ‘co-production’ in the development of climate action outputs, questions remain over how to best unite the contrasting epistemological traditions and norms associated with different stakeholders. Drawing on the existing literatures on climate action co-production and from translational perspectives on the science-policy interface, in this paper we develop the concept of ‘boundary agency’. Defining this as the agency ‘possessed’ when willing and able to translate between different epistemological communities invested in a similar policy and governance challenge such as climate change, we offer it as a useful means to reflect on participants’ understanding of the ‘co’ in co-production. This is in contrast to the more established (often academic-led) focus on what it is that is being produced by co-production processes. We draw from two complementary empirical studies, which explicitly encouraged i) engagement and ii) reflection on cross-boundary co-production between climate action stakeholders from different backgrounds. Reflecting on the two studies, we discuss the benefits of (and barriers to) encouraging more active and sustained engagement between climate action stakeholders so as to try to actively blur the boundaries between science and policy and, in doing so, invent new epistemological communities of practice. © 2021 The Author(s)
关键词	Boundary agency Climate action Climate change Climate knowledge Co-production Decision making
语种	英语
scopus关键词	climate change; knowledge; literature review; policy approach; stakeholder; sustainability
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/249528
作者单位	Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Sciences, United Kingdom; School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Collingwood Environmental Planning, 50 Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK, United Kingdom; Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, University Campus, Guildford, UK, United Kingdom; Green Investment Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Howarth C.,Lane M.,Morse-Jones S.,等. The ‘co’ in co-production of climate action: Challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice[J],2022,72.
APA	Howarth C.,Lane M.,Morse-Jones S.,Brooks K.,&Viner D..(2022).The ‘co’ in co-production of climate action: Challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice.Global Environmental Change,72.
MLA	Howarth C.,et al."The ‘co’ in co-production of climate action: Challenging boundaries within and between science, policy and practice".Global Environmental Change 72(2022).