气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117742
	Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance
	Bohlin-Nizzetto P.; Melymuk L.; White K.B.; Kalina J.; Madadi V.O.; Adu-Kumi S.; Prokeš R.; Přibylová P.; Klánová J.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	1352-2310
卷号	238
英文摘要	Polyurethane foam (PUF) passive air samplers (PAS) are widely used for measurements of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in large-scale monitoring networks as well as in case studies around the globe. Calibration of PUF-PAS is performed by field-based calibration studies or passive sampler uptake models. Both are typically performed and/or validated in temperate zones, however the sampling rates are more widely applied, including in tropical and polar zones. Here, we present field-based calibration results for MONET PUF-PAS from a subtropical and tropical site (Nairobi, Kenya and Accra, Ghana) based on side-by-side deployment of PUF-PAS and active air samplers (AAS), as well as model PAS uptake from available passive sampler uptake models. By comparing these results with a similar calibration from a temperate site (Brno, Czech Republic), we show that higher ambient temperatures result in higher effective sampling rates for intermediate molecular weight SVOCs (logKOA of 7–11) as a result of lower particle-bound fractions, and in lower sample volumes for lighter SVOCs (logKOA<7) as a result of a shorter time to equilibrium. This highlights the importance of adjusting passive sampling rates according to site-specific air temperatures. Model-based calibrations provided sampling volumes in agreement with the field-based calibration except for high KOA compounds, but the source of the discrepancy appears to be the model parameterization of the specific PUF-PAS sampler type rather than temperature-induced differences. Overall, the results suggest that while careful consideration should be taken when extrapolating calibration information from temperate to tropical zones, field or model-based calibrations are appropriate, and greater attention should be given to ensuring passive sampler models are correctly parameterized for the sampling configuration used. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
关键词	Passive air sampling Persistent organic pollutants Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Polyurethane foam Sampling rates
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Calibration; Climate models; Organic pollutants; Polyurethanes; Rigid foamed plastics; Tropics; Volatile organic compounds; Calibration information; Large-scale monitoring; Model parameterization; Model-based calibration; Passive air sampler; Persistent organic pollutants; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs); Temperature-induced; Importance sampling; 2,2',4,4' tetrabromodiphenyl ether; chlorphenotane; fluoranthene; polychlorinated biphenyl; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; polyurethan foam; air sampling; ambient air; calibration; foam; model test; molecular analysis; organic pollutant; parameterization; pollution monitoring; sampler; volatile organic compound; air sampling; ambient air; Article; calibration; climate change; comparative study; controlled study; environmental temperature; molecular weight; priority journal; Accra; Brno; Czech Republic; Ghana; Ghana; Greater Accra; Jihomoravsky; Kenya; Nairobi [Kenya]
来源期刊	ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/249021
作者单位	NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Instituttveien 18, PO Box 100, Kjeller, NO-2027, Norway; RECETOX, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, Pavilion A29, Brno, 625 00, Czech Republic; Department of Chemistry, University of Nairobi, P. O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya; Ghana Environmental Protection Agency, P. O. Box M.326, Accra, Ghana
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Bohlin-Nizzetto P.,Melymuk L.,White K.B.,et al. Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance[J],2020,238.
APA	Bohlin-Nizzetto P..,Melymuk L..,White K.B..,Kalina J..,Madadi V.O..,...&Klánová J..(2020).Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance.ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT,238.
MLA	Bohlin-Nizzetto P.,et al."Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance".ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT 238(2020).