气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best–worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups

CCPortal

DOI	10.1007/s11069-020-04348-3
	Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best–worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups
	Nyimbili P.H.; Erden T.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	0921030X
起始页码	1031
结束页码	1067
卷号	105 期号:1
英文摘要	Nowadays, organizational decisions are made collectively in decision groups to achieve more meaningful and impactful outcomes, ranging from product design, policy and strategy formulation and resource allocation. This research, therefore, suggests a group decision-making (GDM) approach utilizing a recently developed MCDM method known as best–worst method (BWM) in combination with GIS for planning suitable areas for new emergency facilities in Istanbul. Using two decision-maker (DM) groups consisting of academic-related professionals and fire brigade practitioners, the BWM method was used to evaluate the associated weights and preference rankings of six pre-selected criteria, derived from pairwise comparisons of the best and worst criterion for each DM. The preference criteria of the two DM groups were examined to deepen the understanding of the varying perceptions about the level of influence of the criteria from a theoretical and practical view as well as to reflect a real-case scenario in typical GDM problems where group agreement or reliability is assessed by consensus using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, W. The BWM results were compared for model validation with the AHP and found to be reliable and consistent. Further, from statistical tests conducted, it was inferred that criteria C4 (density of hazardous materials) and C1 (high population density) were perceived to be the most important by the academician and fire brigade practitioner DM group, respectively. For both DM groups, criterion C6 (distance from earthquake risk) was viewed to be the least important. Resultant raster suitability maps for both DM groups were produced for visualizing the BWM model. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
关键词	Analytical hierarchy process (AHP)Best–worst method (BWM)Emergency facility planning Geographic information system (GIS)Group decision-making (GDM)Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM)
英文关键词	analytical hierarchy process; comparative study; decision making; GIS; model validation; multicriteria analysis; reliability analysis; theoretical study; Istanbul [Turkey]; Turkey
语种	英语
来源期刊	Natural Hazards
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/206465
作者单位	Department of Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 34469, Turkey
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Nyimbili P.H.,Erden T.. Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best–worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups[J],2021,105(1).
APA	Nyimbili P.H.,&Erden T..(2021).Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best–worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups.Natural Hazards,105(1).
MLA	Nyimbili P.H.,et al."Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best–worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups".Natural Hazards 105.1(2021).