Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112426 |
Making the TEN-E regulation compatible with the Green Deal: Eligibility, selection, and cost allocation for PCIs | |
Schittekatte T.; Pototschnig A.; Meeus L.; Jamasb T.; Llorca M. | |
发表日期 | 2021 |
ISSN | 03014215 |
卷号 | 156 |
英文摘要 | The European Green Deal calls for a revision of the Regulation on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure (TEN-E Regulation). The focus of the TEN-E Regulation was on accelerating the development of strategically important projects linking energy networks across the EU, labelled as Projects of Common Interest (PCIs). We provide seven recommendations on how to revise the Regulation to align it with the new full decarbonisation objective. We split the analysis in three parts: the eligibility, selection and cost allocation of PCIs. Regarding eligibility, first, oil networks should be excluded, while the case of gas networks is debatable. Second, power-to-X technologies, electric charging infrastructure and (smart) gas distribution grids could be added to the scope. Regarding selection, first, the Ten-Year Network Development Plan (TYDNP) should be integrated over all energy vectors using an open-source model. Second and third, the scenarios used in the TYNDPs should be subject to the European Commission's approval, while the approval decision for cost-benefit analysis methodologies should be reallocated from the Commission to ACER. Finally, regarding cost allocation, first, cross-border cost allocation decisions should leave all involved jurisdictions with similar benefit-to-cost ratios to increase commitment. Second, affordability should be the only award criterion for European funding. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd |
关键词 | Energy infrastructureEnergy regulationEuropean green dealSector integration |
英文关键词 | Cost accounting; Cost benefit analysis; Common interests; Cost-allocation; Decarbonisation; Energy infrastructures; Energy networks; Energy regulation; European green deal; Gas networks; Power; Sector integration; Energy policy; cost-benefit analysis; energy policy; European Commission; guideline; numerical model; regulatory framework; Europe |
语种 | 英语 |
来源期刊 | Energy Policy |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/205331 |
作者单位 | Florence School of Regulation (FSR), Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Italy; Copenhagen School of Energy Infrastructure (CSEI), Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark; Vlerick Energy Centre, Vlerick Business School, Belgium |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Schittekatte T.,Pototschnig A.,Meeus L.,et al. Making the TEN-E regulation compatible with the Green Deal: Eligibility, selection, and cost allocation for PCIs[J],2021,156. |
APA | Schittekatte T.,Pototschnig A.,Meeus L.,Jamasb T.,&Llorca M..(2021).Making the TEN-E regulation compatible with the Green Deal: Eligibility, selection, and cost allocation for PCIs.Energy Policy,156. |
MLA | Schittekatte T.,et al."Making the TEN-E regulation compatible with the Green Deal: Eligibility, selection, and cost allocation for PCIs".Energy Policy 156(2021). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。