CCPortal
DOI10.1073/pnas.2023985118
Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality
Waldfogel H.B.; Sheehy-Skeffington J.; Hauser O.P.; Ho A.K.; Kteily N.S.
发表日期2021
ISSN00278424
卷号118期号:14
英文摘要Contemporary debates about addressing inequality require a common, accurate understanding of the scope of the issue at hand. Yet little is known about who notices inequality in the world around them and when. Across five studies (N = 8,779) employing various paradigms, we consider the role of ideological beliefs about the desirability of social equality in shaping individuals' attention to-and accuracy in detecting-inequality across the class, gender, and racial domains. In Study 1, individuals higher (versus lower) on social egalitarianism were more likely to naturalistically remark on inequality when shown photographs of urban scenes. In Study 2, social egalitarians were more accurate at differentiating between equal versus unequal distributions of resources between men and women on a basic cognitive task. In Study 3, social egalitarians were faster to notice inequalityrelevant changes in images in a change detection paradigm indexing basic attentional processes. In Studies 4 and 5, we varied whether unequal treatment adversely affected groups at the top or bottom of society. In Study 4, social egalitarians were, on an incentivized task, more accurate at detecting inequality in speaking time in a panel discussion that disadvantaged women but not when inequality disadvantaged men. In Study 5, social egalitarians were more likely to naturalistically point out bias in a pattern detection hiring task when the employer was biased against minorities but not when majority group members faced equivalent bias. Our results reveal the nuances in how our ideological beliefs shape whether we accurately notice inequality, with implications for prospects for addressing it. © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
英文关键词Attention; Egalitarianism; Ideology; Inequality; Politics
语种英语
scopus关键词adult; article; attention; employer; female; gender; human; human experiment; ideology; major clinical study; male; photography; politics; speech
来源期刊Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/179960
作者单位Department of Management and Organizations, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, United States; Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom; Department of Economics, University of Exeter, Business School, Exeter, EX4 4PU, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Waldfogel H.B.,Sheehy-Skeffington J.,Hauser O.P.,et al. Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality[J],2021,118(14).
APA Waldfogel H.B.,Sheehy-Skeffington J.,Hauser O.P.,Ho A.K.,&Kteily N.S..(2021).Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,118(14).
MLA Waldfogel H.B.,et al."Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118.14(2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Waldfogel H.B.]的文章
[Sheehy-Skeffington J.]的文章
[Hauser O.P.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Waldfogel H.B.]的文章
[Sheehy-Skeffington J.]的文章
[Hauser O.P.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Waldfogel H.B.]的文章
[Sheehy-Skeffington J.]的文章
[Hauser O.P.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。