Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.5194/hess-22-3125-2018 |
Intercomparison of different uncertainty sources in hydrological climate change projections for an alpine catchment (upper Clutha River; New Zealand) | |
Jobst A.M.; Kingston D.G.; Cullen N.J.; Schmid J. | |
发表日期 | 2018 |
ISSN | 1027-5606 |
起始页码 | 3125 |
结束页码 | 3142 |
卷号 | 22期号:6 |
英文摘要 | As climate change is projected to alter both temperature and precipitation, snow-controlled mid-latitude catchments are expected to experience substantial shifts in their seasonal regime, which will have direct implications for water management. In order to provide authoritative projections of climate change impacts, the uncertainty inherent to all components of the modelling chain needs to be accounted for. This study assesses the uncertainty in potential impacts of climate change on the hydro-climate of a headwater sub-catchment of New Zealand's largest catchment (the Clutha River) using a fully distributed hydrological model (WaSiM) and unique ensemble encompassing different uncertainty sources: general circulation model (GCM), emission scenario, bias correction and snow model. The inclusion of snow models is particularly important, given that (1) they are a rarely considered aspect of uncertainty in hydrological modelling studies, and (2) snow has a considerable influence on seasonal patterns of river flow in alpine catchments such as the Clutha. Projected changes in river flow for the 2050s and 2090s encompass substantial increases in streamflow from May to October, and a decline between December and March. The dominant drivers are changes in the seasonal distribution of precipitation (for the 2090s +29 to +84 % in winter) and substantial decreases in the seasonal snow storage due to temperature increase. A quantitative comparison of uncertainty identified GCM structure as the dominant contributor in the seasonal streamflow signal (44-57 %) followed by emission scenario (16-49 %), bias correction (4-22 %) and snow model (3-10 %). While these findings suggest that the role of the snow model is comparatively small, its contribution to the overall uncertainty was still found to be noticeable for winter and summer. © Author(s) 2018. |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Catchments; Climate models; Rivers; Runoff; Snow; Stream flow; Uncertainty analysis; Water management; Climate change impact; Distributed hydrological model; General circulation model; Hydrological climate change; Hydrological modelling; Quantitative comparison; Seasonal distributions; Temperature increase; Climate change; alpine environment; catchment; climate change; general circulation model; headwater; hydrological modeling; precipitation (climatology); river flow; seasonal variation; streamflow; uncertainty analysis; Clutha River; New Zealand; Otago; South Island |
来源期刊 | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/160011 |
作者单位 | Jobst, A.M., Department of Geography, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand; Kingston, D.G., Department of Geography, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand; Cullen, N.J., Department of Geography, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand; Schmid, J., Department of Geography, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Jobst A.M.,Kingston D.G.,Cullen N.J.,et al. Intercomparison of different uncertainty sources in hydrological climate change projections for an alpine catchment (upper Clutha River; New Zealand)[J],2018,22(6). |
APA | Jobst A.M.,Kingston D.G.,Cullen N.J.,&Schmid J..(2018).Intercomparison of different uncertainty sources in hydrological climate change projections for an alpine catchment (upper Clutha River; New Zealand).Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,22(6). |
MLA | Jobst A.M.,et al."Intercomparison of different uncertainty sources in hydrological climate change projections for an alpine catchment (upper Clutha River; New Zealand)".Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 22.6(2018). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。