Climate Change Data Portal
| DOI | 10.5194/hess-24-3699-2020 |
| A new discrete multiplicative random cascade model for downscaling intermittent rainfall fields | |
| Schleiss M. | |
| 发表日期 | 2020 |
| ISSN | 1027-5606 |
| 起始页码 | 3699 |
| 结束页码 | 3723 |
| 卷号 | 24期号:7 |
| 英文摘要 | Spatial downscaling of rainfall fields is a challenging mathematical problem for which many different types of methods have been proposed. One popular solution consists of redistributing rainfall amounts over smaller and smaller scales by means of a discrete multiplicative random cascade (DMRCs). This works well for slowly varying homogeneous rainfall fields but often fails in the presence of intermittency (i.e., large amounts of zero rainfall values). The most common workaround in this case is to use two separate cascade models, namely one for the occurrence and another for the intensity. In this paper, a new and simpler approach based on the notion of equal-volume areas (EVAs) is proposed. Unlike classical cascades where rainfall amounts are redistributed over grid cells of equal size, the EVA cascade splits grid cells into areas of different sizes, with each of them containing exactly half of the original amount of water. The relative areas of the subgrid cells are determined by drawing random values from a logit-normal cascade generator model with scale and intensity-dependent standard deviation (SD). The process ends when the amount of water in each subgrid cell is smaller than a fixed-bucket capacity, at which point the output of the cascade can be resampled over a regular Cartesian mesh. The present paper describes the implementation of the EVA cascade model and gives some first results for 100 selected events in the Netherlands. Performance is assessed by comparing the outputs of the EVA model to bilinear interpolation and to a classical DMRC model based on fixed grid cell sizes. Results show that, on average, the EVA cascade outperforms the classical method, producing fields with more realistic distributions, small-scale extremes and spatial structures. Improvements are mostly credited to the higher robustness of the EVA model in the presence of intermittency and to the lower variance of its generator. However, both approaches have their advantages and weaknesses. For example, while the classical cascade tends to overestimate small-scale variability and extremes, the EVA model tends to produce fields that are slightly too smooth and block shaped compared to the observations. The complementary nature of the two approaches, and the fact that they produce errors of opposite signs, opens up new possibilities for quality control and bias corrections of downscaled fields. © 2020 Author(s). |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| scopus关键词 | Cells; Cytology; Stream flow; Bilinear interpolation; Generator modeling; Intensity-dependent; Mathematical problems; Random cascade model; Small scale variability; Spatial structure; Standard deviation; Rain; downscaling; hydrological modeling; quality control; rainfall; Netherlands |
| 来源期刊 | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
 |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/159343 |
| 作者单位 | Schleiss, M., Department of Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Schleiss M.. A new discrete multiplicative random cascade model for downscaling intermittent rainfall fields[J],2020,24(7). |
| APA | Schleiss M..(2020).A new discrete multiplicative random cascade model for downscaling intermittent rainfall fields.Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,24(7). |
| MLA | Schleiss M.."A new discrete multiplicative random cascade model for downscaling intermittent rainfall fields".Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 24.7(2020). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
| 个性服务 |
| 推荐该条目 |
| 保存到收藏夹 |
| 导出为Endnote文件 |
| 谷歌学术 |
| 谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
| [Schleiss M.]的文章 |
| 百度学术 |
| 百度学术中相似的文章 |
| [Schleiss M.]的文章 |
| 必应学术 |
| 必应学术中相似的文章 |
| [Schleiss M.]的文章 |
| 相关权益政策 |
| 暂无数据 |
| 收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
