气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117666
	Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests
	Venanzi R.; Picchio R.; Grigolato S.; Latterini F.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	0378-1127
卷号	454
英文摘要	Coppice is considered the oldest form of sustainable forest management in the Mediterranean area. Generally, it produces rapidly woody biomass and environmental benefits. This research was implemented through an experimental design based on two steps: analyzing the impact of silvicultural treatment (coppice with standards) and logging on forest soil and tree regeneration. It included the soil and regeneration recovery capacity of forests managed as coppice related to different logging systems and treatments applied over a six-year period. The findings demonstrated that tree species regeneration composition was not affected by silvicultural treatment and only slightly by harvesting system. Instead, the physical, chemical and biological soil features were only marginally affected by the silvicultural treatment applied, but strongly impacted by harvesting operations, with clear differences between the systems. The least damaging harvesting system was TLS (Tree Length System) followed by FTS (Full Tree System) and SWS (Short Wood System) that showed a more intense impact. This trend started only six months after harvesting and continued for more than 36 months post-harvesting in a lesser dynamic. The recovery of coppicing was almost complete 36 months after harvesting, without substantial differences between logging systems. Recovery from logging showed a clear positive trend, but 52 months after harvesting only the TLS area had completely recovered. For FTS and SWS, recovery occurred but was very weak. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.
英文关键词	Biological soil quality; Logging operation; Resilience; Soil impact; Tree diversity; Turkey oak
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Chemical operations; Harvesting; Recovery; Soils; Biological soil; Logging operations; Resilience; Tree diversity; Turkey oak; Reforestation; coppice; deciduous tree; experimental design; extraction method; forest management; forest soil; harvesting; logging (timber); physicochemical property; regeneration; resilience; silviculture; species diversity; sustainability; Coppice; Harvesting; Logging; Quercus Laevis; Recovery; Reforestation; Resilience; Trees; Quercus cerris
来源期刊	Forest Ecology and Management
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/155697
作者单位	Department of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, Via S. Camillo de Lellis, Viterbo, 01100, Italy; Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, Legnaro, PD 35020, Italy
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Venanzi R.,Picchio R.,Grigolato S.,et al. Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests[J],2019,454.
APA	Venanzi R.,Picchio R.,Grigolato S.,&Latterini F..(2019).Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests.Forest Ecology and Management,454.
MLA	Venanzi R.,et al."Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests".Forest Ecology and Management 454(2019).