气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Size matters but is big always better? Effectiveness of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as treatment against Heterobasidion on Picea abies stumps of variable size

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117998
	Size matters but is big always better? Effectiveness of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as treatment against Heterobasidion on Picea abies stumps of variable size
	Blomquist M.; Larsson Herrera S.; Hofmann J.; Beram R.C.; Cleary M.; Rönnberg J.
发表日期	2020
ISSN	0378-1127
卷号	462
英文摘要	Heterobasidion is a severe threat to coniferous forests in the northern hemisphere. Accurate forest management is needed to safeguard the economic values at stake. In this paper we investigate the efficacy of stump treatment with urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as control treatment in Norway spruce against airborne Heterobasidion infections. The aim of this study was to examine the infection frequency, i.e. frequency of stumps infected by airborne spores, and efficacy of the stump treatments after performing precommercial thinning and final felling, representing highly variable stump diameters. Today treatment after these cuttings are not standard practice across the world. From a total of 27 Norway spruce stands in the southern and mid-regions of Sweden, five precommercial thinning stands and five final felling stands with infection frequencies higher than an economical threshold for treatment, 20%, were selected. In these stands, the efficacy of stump treatment using urea and P. gigantea against Heterobasidion spp. was assessed on stumps of variable diameter. Wooden discs from stumps were analyzed for airborne infections of Heterobasidion spp. 7–8 weeks after treatment. To evaluate the efficacy of treatments, we used the following three different measurements; infection frequency (proportion of infected stumps), relative infected stump area and number of Heterobasidion colonies per square dm, which were tested using three different statistical models each represented by an efficacy value. Overall, untreated stumps were infected to a higher extent than treated stumps, and most infections were found in untreated stumps from final fellings. Treatment with P. gigantea was more efficient for larger sized stumps than small. In precommercial thinnings, urea performed better and had higher mean efficacy values (92–94%) compared to P. gigantea (59%-72%). In final fellings there were no significant differences between the treatments, both had high efficacy values (urea 95.5–99.8% vs P. gigantea 90–98%). Our findings point at the need for accurate stump treatment after precommercial thinning and final felling, when infection rates are likely to be high. Urea seems to be more effective than the biological control agent P. gigantea in controlling Heterobasidion infections in stumps created in precommercial thinnings. We therefore recommend to use urea in precommercial thinnings if possible. In final fellings either urea or P. gigantea can be used. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Metabolism; Plants (botany); Urea; Airborne infection; Biological control agent; Coniferous forests; Northern Hemispheres; Norway spruce stands; Phlebiopsis gigantea; Pre-commercial thinning; Standard practices; Forestry; airborne survey; biological control; coniferous forest; economic activity; forest management; fungal disease; Northern Hemisphere; stand structure; thinning; urea; Diseases; Felling; Forestry; Frequency; Metabolism; Processing; Stumps; Urea; Sweden; Heterobasidion; Phlebiopsis gigantea; Picea abies
来源期刊	Forest Ecology and Management
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/155365
作者单位	Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Sundsvägen 3, Alnarp, SE-23053, Sweden; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Sundsvägen 14, Alnarp, SE-23053, Sweden; Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Isparta, 32260, Turkey
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Blomquist M.,Larsson Herrera S.,Hofmann J.,et al. Size matters but is big always better? Effectiveness of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as treatment against Heterobasidion on Picea abies stumps of variable size[J],2020,462.
APA	Blomquist M.,Larsson Herrera S.,Hofmann J.,Beram R.C.,Cleary M.,&Rönnberg J..(2020).Size matters but is big always better? Effectiveness of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as treatment against Heterobasidion on Picea abies stumps of variable size.Forest Ecology and Management,462.
MLA	Blomquist M.,et al."Size matters but is big always better? Effectiveness of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as treatment against Heterobasidion on Picea abies stumps of variable size".Forest Ecology and Management 462(2020).