气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Using the Pneumatic method to estimate embolism resistance in species with long vessels: A commentary on the article “A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees”

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118547
	Using the Pneumatic method to estimate embolism resistance in species with long vessels: A commentary on the article “A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees”
	Pereira L.; Bittencourt P.R.L.; Rowland L.; Brum M.; Miranda M.T.; Pacheco V.S.; Oliveira R.S.; Machado E.C.; Jansen S.; Ribeiro R.V.
发表日期	2021
ISSN	0378-1127
卷号	479
英文摘要	Comparisons among methods are essential to validate plant traits measured across studies. However, a rigorous analysis is a complex task that needs to take into account not only the principle of the method and its correct use, but also inherent intraspecific trait variability, something we feel is not fully considered by Sergent et al. (2020). They compared the Bench dehydration, MicroCT, and Pneumatic methods using three long-vesseled species and found divergence among these methods. As a key finding, Sergent and colleagues reported unreliable estimates of Ψ50 for Olea europaea when using the Pneumatic method in a such long-vesseled species. Here, we tested this finding by measuring independently vulnerability curves for O. europaea. Our results reinforce the viability of the Pneumatic method to estimate embolism vulnerability in long-vesseled species, as already found by others. Briefly, we also discuss important procedures when using the Pneumatic method and encourage further experiments, as the only way to know better the limitations of available methods and improve our understanding about plant water relations. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Computerized tomography; Diseases; Complex task; Europaea; Micro CT; Olea europaea; Plant traits; Plant water relations; Pneumatic methods; Rigorous analysis; Pneumatic control; Olea europaea
来源期刊	Forest Ecology and Management
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154930
作者单位	Laboratory of Plant Physiology “Coaracy M. Franco”, Center R&D in Ecophysiology and Biophysics, Agronomic Institute (IAC), Campinas, SP, Brazil; Department of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil; College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States; Institute of Systematic Botany and Ecology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Pereira L.,Bittencourt P.R.L.,Rowland L.,等. Using the Pneumatic method to estimate embolism resistance in species with long vessels: A commentary on the article “A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees”[J],2021,479.
APA	Pereira L..,Bittencourt P.R.L..,Rowland L..,Brum M..,Miranda M.T..,...&Ribeiro R.V..(2021).Using the Pneumatic method to estimate embolism resistance in species with long vessels: A commentary on the article “A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees”.Forest Ecology and Management,479.
MLA	Pereira L.,et al."Using the Pneumatic method to estimate embolism resistance in species with long vessels: A commentary on the article “A comparison of five methods to assess embolism resistance in trees”".Forest Ecology and Management 479(2021).