Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf937 |
Is wood pellet-based electricity less carbon-intensive than coal-based electricity? It depends on perspectives, baselines, feedstocks, and forest management practices | |
Dwivedi P.; Khanna M.; Fuller M. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 17489318 |
卷号 | 14期号:2 |
英文摘要 | Some studies suggest that the carbon intensity of electricity generated in the United Kingdom by using imported wood pellets from the southern United States is higher than that of coal-based electricity, whereas other studies suggest that the use of wood pellet-based electricity reduces carbon emissions significantly, relative to coal-based electricity. We developed the Forest Bioenergy Carbon Accounting Model (ForBioCAM 1.0) to analyze factors that influence the carbon intensity of wood pellet-based electricity, using a common set of assumptions and the same system boundary. We show that widely differing assessments of the carbon intensity of wood pellet-based electricity depend on the choice of forest management perspectives (landscape or stand), baselines (no harvest, or harvesting for the manufacture of traditional finished wood products), feedstocks (whole trees, pulpwood, or logging residues), forest management practices (change in rotation age), and the duration of the analysis itself. Unlike with a stand perspective, we demonstrate conditions under which a landscape perspective results in carbon savings net of avoided emissions from coal-based electricity. Our results also suggest that the two perspectives of forest management converge in their assessment of the positive carbon effects of various feedstock types used to manufacture wood pellets relative to a no-harvest baseline, and that the use of whole trees for wood pellets results in net carbon savings after a break-even period of about three years relative to a no-harvest scenario. The results of this study can guide future policy deliberations on the use of wood pellets as a renewable energy source worldwide. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. |
英文关键词 | carbon intensity; climate change; environmental policy; forest management; wood pellets |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Carbon; Climate change; Coal; Environmental protection; Feedstocks; Harvesting; Manufacture; Pelletizing; Renewable energy resources; Wood; Avoided emissions; Carbon accounting model; Carbon intensity; Environmental policy; Finished wood products; Forest management practices; Renewable energy source; Wood pellet; Forestry; alternative energy; baseline conditions; carbon footprint; climate change; electricity generation; energy efficiency; forest management; fuelwood; harvesting; Carbon; Coal; Harvesting; Manufacture; Pelleting; Wood; United Kingdom; United States |
来源期刊 | Environmental Research Letters
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154708 |
作者单位 | Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States; Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, United States; Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Dwivedi P.,Khanna M.,Fuller M.. Is wood pellet-based electricity less carbon-intensive than coal-based electricity? It depends on perspectives, baselines, feedstocks, and forest management practices[J],2019,14(2). |
APA | Dwivedi P.,Khanna M.,&Fuller M..(2019).Is wood pellet-based electricity less carbon-intensive than coal-based electricity? It depends on perspectives, baselines, feedstocks, and forest management practices.Environmental Research Letters,14(2). |
MLA | Dwivedi P.,et al."Is wood pellet-based electricity less carbon-intensive than coal-based electricity? It depends on perspectives, baselines, feedstocks, and forest management practices".Environmental Research Letters 14.2(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。