CCPortal
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab5139
Large-scale pasture restoration may not be the best option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil
Batista E.; Soares-Filho B.; Barbosa F.; Merry F.; Davis J.; Van Der Hoff R.; Rajaõ R.G.
发表日期2019
ISSN17489318
卷号14期号:12
英文摘要Cattle ranching accounts for 44% of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the land use sector in Brazil. In response, Brazil has proposed a massive pasture restoration program that aspires to make ranching more competitive while at the same time reducing associated GHG emissions. Pasture restoration, however, is only one of several intensification options that could be employed to achieve these goals. Here we analyze potential production, economic return and GHG emissions from an intensification strategy based mainly on pasture restoration and compare its productive, economic and GHG emissions performances with intensification options more focused on supplemental feeding (grain-feed supplementation of grazing animals and animal finishing in feedlots). To this end, we developed a multi-sectoral, deterministic simulation model of the ranching system and applied it to Mato Grosso state, the largest producer and earliest adopter of intensive production. To account for GHG emissions, we performed a life cycle analysis of a complete beef production cycle. Our results show that an intensification strategy focused more heavily on pasture restoration does reduce GHG emissions but produces the least favorable economic and GHG emissions outcomes when compared with a range of supplemental feeding alternatives. In view of these results, Brazil should seek a more diversified strategies for cattle intensification in its climate mitigation policy. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
英文关键词Cattle ranching intensification; Climate change mitigation; Land use policy; Life cycle analysis; The brazilian amazon
语种英语
scopus关键词Agriculture; Animals; Artificial life; Climate change; Gas emissions; Land use; Life cycle; Restoration; Brazilian Amazon; Cattle ranching; Climate change mitigation; Land use policy; Life cycle analysis; Greenhouse gases; cattle; climate modeling; emission control; environmental policy; greenhouse gas; land use change; life cycle analysis; simulation; Brazil; Mato Grosso; Animalia; Bos
来源期刊Environmental Research Letters
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/154286
作者单位Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Avenida Peter Henry Rolfs, s/n-Campus Universitário, Viçosa-MG36570-000, Brazil; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627-Pampulha, Belo Horizonte-MG, 31270-901, Brazil; Conservation Strategy Fund, 1636 R St.NW Suite 3, Washington, DC 20009, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Batista E.,Soares-Filho B.,Barbosa F.,et al. Large-scale pasture restoration may not be the best option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil[J],2019,14(12).
APA Batista E..,Soares-Filho B..,Barbosa F..,Merry F..,Davis J..,...&Rajaõ R.G..(2019).Large-scale pasture restoration may not be the best option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil.Environmental Research Letters,14(12).
MLA Batista E.,et al."Large-scale pasture restoration may not be the best option to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil".Environmental Research Letters 14.12(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Batista E.]的文章
[Soares-Filho B.]的文章
[Barbosa F.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Batista E.]的文章
[Soares-Filho B.]的文章
[Barbosa F.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Batista E.]的文章
[Soares-Filho B.]的文章
[Barbosa F.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。