Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9465 |
Keep it real: Selecting realistic sets of urban green space indicators | |
Carmen R.; Jacobs S.; Leone M.; Palliwoda J.; Pinto L.; Misiune I.; Priess J.A.; Pereira P.; Wanner S.; Ferreira C.S.; Ferreira A. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 17489318 |
卷号 | 15期号:9 |
英文摘要 | With increasing urbanisation, urban green spaces are expected to be crucial for urban resilience and sustainability, through the delivery of ecological, economic and social benefits. In practice, however, planning, management and evaluation of urban green spaces are rarely structured and evidence-based. This represents a missed opportunity to account for, track and foster the multiple benefits that green spaces are expected to deliver. To gain insight into this gap, this study assesses the availability and uptake of relevant evidence by city governments. Interviews, focus groups and quantitative surveys were applied in four medium-sized European cities: Coimbra (Portugal), Genk (Belgium), Leipzig (Germany), and Vilnius (Lithuania), covering the main governance and climatic gradients in Europe. Using straightforward data exploration and regression, we analyse which ecological, economic and social indicators are typically chosen by cities and why. Together with the city stakeholders, we derived a common set of benefit categories and key performance indicators which can be adapted to diverse local contexts. We conclude that cities tend to make pragmatic decisions when composing their indicator sets, but nevertheless cover multiple urban green space dimensions. Finally, we explore how indicator choice could be optimised towards a complementary and credible indicator set, taking into account a realistically feasible monitoring effort undertaken by the cities. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. |
英文关键词 | feasibility; key performance indicator; natures contributions to people; plural values; urban green space |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Benchmarking; Ecology; Climatic gradients; Data exploration; Economic and social benefits; Economic and social indicators; European cities; Key performance indicators; Urban green spaces; Urban resilience; Urban planning; governance approach; greenspace; questionnaire survey; socioeconomic conditions; sustainability; urban planning; urbanization; Belgium; Coimbra [Portugal]; Germany; Leipzig; Lithuania; Portugal; Saxony; Vilnius |
来源期刊 | Environmental Research Letters
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153787 |
作者单位 | Research Group Nature and Society, Research Institute for Nature and Forest INBO, Havenlaan 88 bus 73, Brussels, 1000, Belgium; Belgian Biodiversity Platform BBPF, Avenue Louise 231, Brussels, 1050, Belgium; Helmholtz-Center for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department for Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstraße 15, Leipzig, D-04318, Germany; Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Escola Superior Agrária de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Environmental Management Laboratory, Mykolas Romeris University, Vilnius, Lithuania |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Carmen R.,Jacobs S.,Leone M.,et al. Keep it real: Selecting realistic sets of urban green space indicators[J],2020,15(9). |
APA | Carmen R..,Jacobs S..,Leone M..,Palliwoda J..,Pinto L..,...&Ferreira A..(2020).Keep it real: Selecting realistic sets of urban green space indicators.Environmental Research Letters,15(9). |
MLA | Carmen R.,et al."Keep it real: Selecting realistic sets of urban green space indicators".Environmental Research Letters 15.9(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。