Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/abaf87 |
Forest regeneration on European sheep pasture is an economically viable climate change mitigation strategy | |
O'Neill C.; Lim F.K.S.; Edwards D.P.; Osborne C.P. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 17489318 |
卷号 | 15期号:10 |
英文摘要 | Livestock production uses 37% of land globally and is responsible for 15% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Yet livestock farmers across Europe receive billions of dollars in annual subsidies to support their livelihoods. This study evaluates whether diverting European subsidies into the restoration of trees on abandoned farmland represents a cost-effective negative-emissions strategy for mitigating climate change. Focusing on sheep farming in the United Kingdom, and on natural regeneration and planted native forests, we show that, without subsidies, sheep farming is not profitable when farmers are paid for their labour. Despite the much lower productivity of upland farms, upland and lowland farms are financially comparable per hectare. Conversion to 'carbon forests' is possible via natural regeneration when close to existing trees, which are seed sources. This strategy is financially viable without subsidies, meeting the net present value of poorly performing sheep farming at a competitive $4/tCO2eq. If tree planting is required to establish forests, then ∼$55/tCO2eq is needed to break-even, making it uneconomical under current carbon market prices without financial aid to cover establishment costs. However, this break-even price is lower than the theoretical social value of carbon ($68/tCO2eq), which represents the economic cost of CO2 emissions to society. The viability of land-use conversion without subsidies therefore depends on low farm performance, strong likelihood of natural regeneration, and high carbon-market price, plus overcoming potential trade-offs between the cultural and social values placed on pastoral livestock systems and climate change mitigation. The morality of subsidising farming practices that cause high GHG emissions in Europe, whilst spending billions annually on protecting forest carbon in less developed nations to slow climate change is questionable. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. |
英文关键词 | carbon costs; forest regeneration; greenhouse gas mitigation; livestock; pasture; subsidies |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Carbon; Commerce; Cost effectiveness; Costs; Economic and social effects; Farms; Gas emissions; Greenhouse gases; Land use; Reforestation; Abandoned farmland; Climate change mitigation; Economically viable; Farming practices; Forest regeneration; Livestock production; Livestock systems; Natural regeneration; Climate change; climate change; climate effect; economic analysis; environmental economics; environmental impact; mitigation; pasture; regeneration; sheep; strategic approach; Ovis aries |
来源期刊 | Environmental Research Letters
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/153587 |
作者单位 | Grantham Centre for Sustainable Futures, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom; Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | O'Neill C.,Lim F.K.S.,Edwards D.P.,et al. Forest regeneration on European sheep pasture is an economically viable climate change mitigation strategy[J],2020,15(10). |
APA | O'Neill C.,Lim F.K.S.,Edwards D.P.,&Osborne C.P..(2020).Forest regeneration on European sheep pasture is an economically viable climate change mitigation strategy.Environmental Research Letters,15(10). |
MLA | O'Neill C.,et al."Forest regeneration on European sheep pasture is an economically viable climate change mitigation strategy".Environmental Research Letters 15.10(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。