气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Peak analysis of sedimentary charcoal records: Some underlying assumptions and potential pitfalls

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106002
	Peak analysis of sedimentary charcoal records: Some underlying assumptions and potential pitfalls
	Crawford A.J.; Vachula R.S.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	0277-3791
卷号	225
英文摘要	Fire histories are derived from sedimentary charcoal sequences using a suite of statistical techniques that has become increasingly complex. Here we outline the various assumptions that underpin these methods, and highlight potential sources of error that must be considered. We hope to spur debate on the circumstances in which such methods are appropriate, and highlight areas needing further research. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Charcoal; Fire history; Peak analysis; Potential sources; Statistical techniques; Sedimentology; charcoal; error correction; fire history; pitfall trap; sediment analysis; statistical analysis
来源期刊	Quaternary Science Reviews
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/151696
作者单位	College of Liberal Arts, Bath Spa University, Newton Park Campus, Newton St. Loe, Bath, BA2 9BN, United Kingdom; Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States; Institute at Brown for Environment and Society, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Crawford A.J.,Vachula R.S.. Peak analysis of sedimentary charcoal records: Some underlying assumptions and potential pitfalls[J],2019,225.
APA	Crawford A.J.,&Vachula R.S..(2019).Peak analysis of sedimentary charcoal records: Some underlying assumptions and potential pitfalls.Quaternary Science Reviews,225.
MLA	Crawford A.J.,et al."Peak analysis of sedimentary charcoal records: Some underlying assumptions and potential pitfalls".Quaternary Science Reviews 225(2019).