Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4 |
Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability | |
Pfrommer T.; Goeschl T.; Proelss A.; Carrier M.; Lenhard J.; Martin H.; Niemeier U.; Schmidt H. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 0165-0009 |
起始页码 | 67 |
结束页码 | 84 |
卷号 | 152期号:1 |
英文摘要 | Climate litigation has attracted renewed interest as a governance tool. A key challenge in climate litigation is to assess the factual basis of causation. Extreme weather attribution, specifically the Fraction of Attributable Risk (FAR), has been proposed as a way to tackle this challenge. What remains unclear is how attribution science interacts with the legal admissibility of evidence based on climate models. While evidence has to be legally admissible in order to be considered in a trial, it has to be reliable in order for the court to arrive at a legally correct conclusion. Since parties to the trial have incentives to produce evidence favorable to their case, admissibility requirements and the reliability of the evidence brought forward are linked. We provide a specific proposal for how to accommodate FAR estimates in admissibility standards by modifying an existing set of admissibility criteria, the Daubert criteria. We argue that two of the five Daubert criteria are unsuitable for dealing with such evidence and that replacing those criteria with ones directly addressing the reliability of FAR estimates is adequate. Lastly, we highlight the dependence of courts on both the existence and accessibility of a framework to determine the reliability of FAR estimates in executing such criteria. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V. |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Laws and legislation; Reliability; Attributable risks; Daubert; Evidence-based; Extreme weather; Climate models; climate change; climate conditions; climate modeling; governance approach; risk assessment |
来源期刊 | Climatic Change |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147537 |
作者单位 | Department of Economics, Heidelberg University, Bergheimer Str. 20, Heidelberg, 69115, Germany; Faculty of Law, University of Hamburg, Rothenbaumchaussee 33, Hamburg, 20148, Germany; Philosophy Department and Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Science, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany; Institute of Environmental Law of Trier University (IUTR), Trier University, Campus II - Building H, Trier, 54286, Germany; Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstr. 53, Hamburg, 20146, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Pfrommer T.,Goeschl T.,Proelss A.,et al. Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability[J],2019,152(1). |
APA | Pfrommer T..,Goeschl T..,Proelss A..,Carrier M..,Lenhard J..,...&Schmidt H..(2019).Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability.Climatic Change,152(1). |
MLA | Pfrommer T.,et al."Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability".Climatic Change 152.1(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。