CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s10584-019-02375-z
Public support for carbon dioxide removal strategies: the role of tampering with nature perceptions
Wolske K.S.; Raimi K.T.; Campbell-Arvai V.; Hart P.S.
发表日期2019
ISSN0165-0009
起始页码345
结束页码361
卷号152期号:2020-03-04
英文摘要Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) describes a suite of controversial approaches to mitigating climate change that involve removing existing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Through an online survey experiment with US adults (N = 980), we examine three factors that may shape public support for different types of CDR strategies: (1) perceptions that CDR tampers with nature, (2) individual-level variation in the degree to which people are uncomfortable with activities that tamper with nature, and (3) information about the risks and benefits associated with each CDR strategy. Using a moderated mediation analysis, we find that support for different CDR strategies is, in part, a function of how much each strategy is perceived to tamper with nature. Support for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and direct air capture (DAC) was lower than support for afforestation and reforestation (AR), as BECCS and DAC were perceived to tamper with nature more. These effects were particularly strong among individuals generally opposed to the idea of humans interfering with natural processes. Moreover, we find evidence that describing the risks and benefits of each CDR strategy dampens support; for AR and BECCS, this effect was again mediated through perceptions of tampering, while for DAC, the effect of describing these tradeoffs appeared to operate independently of perceived tampering. We conclude that policymakers and science communicators need to be mindful of how CDR strategies are described to the public, as perceptions of tampering with nature may be an important driver of their acceptance. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
语种英语
scopus关键词Carbon capture; Climate change; Clock and data recovery circuits (CDR circuits); Public risks; Reforestation; Risk perception; Carbon dioxide removal; Individual levels; Mediation analysis; Natural process; Online surveys; Policy makers; Public support; Science communicators; Carbon dioxide; afforestation; bioenergy; carbon dioxide; environmental economics; perception; pollutant removal; public attitude; questionnaire survey; trade-off; World Wide Web; United States
来源期刊Climatic Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147498
作者单位Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, 1307 E 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637, United States; Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, 735 S. State St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-3091, United States; School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, 440 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States; Communication Studies | Program in the Environment, University of Michigan, 105 S. State St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Wolske K.S.,Raimi K.T.,Campbell-Arvai V.,et al. Public support for carbon dioxide removal strategies: the role of tampering with nature perceptions[J],2019,152(2020-03-04).
APA Wolske K.S.,Raimi K.T.,Campbell-Arvai V.,&Hart P.S..(2019).Public support for carbon dioxide removal strategies: the role of tampering with nature perceptions.Climatic Change,152(2020-03-04).
MLA Wolske K.S.,et al."Public support for carbon dioxide removal strategies: the role of tampering with nature perceptions".Climatic Change 152.2020-03-04(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Wolske K.S.]的文章
[Raimi K.T.]的文章
[Campbell-Arvai V.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Wolske K.S.]的文章
[Raimi K.T.]的文章
[Campbell-Arvai V.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Wolske K.S.]的文章
[Raimi K.T.]的文章
[Campbell-Arvai V.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。