气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions

CCPortal

DOI	10.1007/s10584-019-02521-7
	Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions
	Sovacool B.K.; Martiskainen M.; Hook A.; Baker L.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	0165-0009
起始页码	581
结束页码	619
卷号	155 期号:4
英文摘要	Low-carbon transitions are often assumed as positive phenomena, because they supposedly reduce carbon emissions, yet without vigilance, there is evidence that they can in fact create new injustices and vulnerabilities, while also failing to address pre-existing structural drivers of injustice in energy markets and the wider socio-economy. With this in mind, we examine four European low-carbon transitions from an unusual normative perspective: that of energy justice. Because a multitude of studies looks at the co-benefits of renewable energy, low-carbon mobility, or climate change mitigation, we instead ask in this paper what are the types of injustices associated with low-carbon transitions? Relatedly, in what ways do low-carbon transitions worsen social risks or vulnerabilities? Lastly, what policies might be deployed to make these transitions more just? We answer these questions by first elaborating an “energy justice” framework consisting of four distinct dimensions—distributive justice (costs and benefits), procedural justice (due process), cosmopolitan justice (global externalities), and recognition justice (vulnerable groups). We then examine four European low-carbon transitions—nuclear power in France, smart meters in Great Britain, electric vehicles in Norway, and solar energy in Germany—through this critical justice lens. In doing so, we draw from original data collected from 64 semi-structured interviews with expert participants as well as five public focus groups and the monitoring of twelve large internet forums. We document 120 distinct energy injustices across these four transitions, including 19 commonly recurring injustices. We aim to show how when low-carbon transitions unfold, deeper injustices related to equity, distribution, and fairness invariably arise. © 2019, The Author(s).
语种	英语
scopus关键词	Climate change; Economics; Nuclear fuels; Solar energy; Climate change mitigation; Costs and benefits; Low-carbon transitions; Procedural justice; Renewable energies; Semi structured interviews; Structural drivers; Vulnerable groups; Carbon; alternative energy; climate change; cost-benefit analysis; electric vehicle; emission control; energy efficiency; energy planning; environmental justice; social media; solar power; France; Germany; Norway; United Kingdom
来源期刊	Climatic Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147430
作者单位	Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), School of Business, Management, and Economics, University of Sussex, Jubilee Building, Room 367, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9SL, United Kingdom; Center for Energy Technologies, Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Sovacool B.K.,Martiskainen M.,Hook A.,et al. Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions[J],2019,155(4).
APA	Sovacool B.K.,Martiskainen M.,Hook A.,&Baker L..(2019).Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions.Climatic Change,155(4).
MLA	Sovacool B.K.,et al."Decarbonization and its discontents: a critical energy justice perspective on four low-carbon transitions".Climatic Change 155.4(2019).