CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s10584-019-02500-y
Not all carbon dioxide emission scenarios are equally likely: a subjective expert assessment
Ho E.; Budescu D.V.; Bosetti V.; van Vuuren D.P.; Keller K.
发表日期2019
ISSN0165-0009
起始页码545
结束页码561
卷号155期号:4
英文摘要Climate researchers use carbon dioxide emission scenarios to explore alternative climate futures and potential impacts, as well as implications of mitigation and adaptation policies. Often, these scenarios are published without formal probabilistic interpretations, given the deep uncertainty related to future development. However, users often seek such information, a likely range or relative probabilities. Without further specifications, users sometimes pick a small subset of emission scenarios and/or assume that all scenarios are equally likely. Here, we present probabilistic judgments of experts assessing the distribution of 2100 emissions under a business-as-usual and a policy scenario. We obtain the judgments through a method that relies only on pairwise comparisons of various ranges of emissions. There is wide variability between individual experts, but they clearly do not assign equal probabilities for the total range of future emissions. We contrast these judgments with the emission projection ranges derived from the shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs) and a recent multi-model comparison producing probabilistic emission scenarios. Differences on long-term emission probabilities between expert estimates and model-based calculations may result from various factors including model restrictions, a coverage of a wider set of factors by experts, but also group think and inability to appreciate long-term processes. © 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
语种英语
scopus关键词Carbon dioxide; Global warming; Adaptation policies; Carbon dioxide emissions; Emission probabilities; Emission projections; Pair-wise comparison; Probabilistic interpretation; Probabilistic judgments; Relative probability; Probability distributions; adaptation; carbon dioxide; carbon emission; long-term change; socioeconomic status
来源期刊Climatic Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147429
作者单位Fordham University, The Bronx, NY, United States; RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy; PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands; Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Ho E.,Budescu D.V.,Bosetti V.,et al. Not all carbon dioxide emission scenarios are equally likely: a subjective expert assessment[J],2019,155(4).
APA Ho E.,Budescu D.V.,Bosetti V.,van Vuuren D.P.,&Keller K..(2019).Not all carbon dioxide emission scenarios are equally likely: a subjective expert assessment.Climatic Change,155(4).
MLA Ho E.,et al."Not all carbon dioxide emission scenarios are equally likely: a subjective expert assessment".Climatic Change 155.4(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Ho E.]的文章
[Budescu D.V.]的文章
[Bosetti V.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Ho E.]的文章
[Budescu D.V.]的文章
[Bosetti V.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Ho E.]的文章
[Budescu D.V.]的文章
[Bosetti V.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。