CCPortal
DOI10.1007/s10584-020-02746-x
Confident; likely; or both? The implementation of the uncertainty language framework in IPCC special reports
Janzwood S.
发表日期2020
ISSN0165-0009
起始页码1655
结束页码1675
卷号162期号:3
英文摘要The uncertainty language framework used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is designed to encourage the consistent characterization and communication of uncertainty between chapters, working groups, and reports. However, the framework has not been updated since 2010, despite criticism that it was applied inconsistently in the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) and that the distinctions between the framework’s three language scales remain unclear. This article presents a mixed-methods analysis of the application and underlying interpretation of the uncertainty language framework by IPCC authors in the three special reports published since AR5. First, I present an analysis of uncertainty language term usage in three recent special reports: Global Warming of 1.5°C (SR15), Climate Change and Land (SRCCL), and The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC). The language usage analysis highlights how many of the trends identified in previous reports—like the significant increase in the use of confidence terms—have carried forward into the special reports. These observed trends, along with ongoing debates in the literature on how to interpret the framework’s three language scales, inform an analysis of IPCC author experiences interpreting and implementing the framework. This discussion is informed by interviews with IPCC authors. Lastly, I propose several recommendations for clarifying the IPCC uncertainty language framework to address persistent sources of confusion highlighted by the authors. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
英文关键词Assessment; Expert judgement; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Sixth assessment report; Special reports; Uncertainty
语种英语
scopus关键词C (programming language); Global warming; Changing climate; Cryosphere; Intergovernmental panel on climate changes; Mixed method; Usage analysis; Working groups; Uncertainty analysis; assessment method; climate change; data interpretation; global warming; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; language; questionnaire survey; uncertainty analysis
来源期刊Climatic Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/147046
作者单位University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Janzwood S.. Confident; likely; or both? The implementation of the uncertainty language framework in IPCC special reports[J],2020,162(3).
APA Janzwood S..(2020).Confident; likely; or both? The implementation of the uncertainty language framework in IPCC special reports.Climatic Change,162(3).
MLA Janzwood S.."Confident; likely; or both? The implementation of the uncertainty language framework in IPCC special reports".Climatic Change 162.3(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Janzwood S.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Janzwood S.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Janzwood S.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。