气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Atmosphere surface storm track response to resolved ocean mesoscale in two sets of global climate model experiments

CCPortal

DOI	10.1007/s00382-018-4237-9
	Atmosphere surface storm track response to resolved ocean mesoscale in two sets of global climate model experiments
	Small R.J.; Msadek R.; Kwon Y.-O.; Booth J.F.; Zarzycki C.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	0930-7575
起始页码	2067
结束页码	2089
卷号	52 期号:2020-03-04
英文摘要	It has been hypothesized that the ocean mesoscale (particularly ocean fronts) can affect the strength and location of the overlying extratropical atmospheric storm track. In this paper, we examine whether resolving ocean fronts in global climate models indeed leads to significant improvement in the simulated storm track, defined using low level meridional wind. Two main sets of experiments are used: (i) global climate model Community Earth System Model version 1 with non-eddy-resolving standard resolution or with ocean eddy-resolving resolution, and (ii) the same but with the GFDL Climate Model version 2. In case (i), it is found that higher ocean resolution leads to a reduction of a very warm sea surface temperature (SST) bias at the east coasts of the U.S. and Japan seen in standard resolution models. This in turn leads to a reduction of storm track strength near the coastlines, by up to 20%, and a better location of the storm track maxima, over the western boundary currents as observed. In case (ii), the change in absolute SST bias in these regions is less notable, and there are modest (10% or less) increases in surface storm track, and smaller changes in the free troposphere. In contrast, in the southern Indian Ocean, case (ii) shows most sensitivity to ocean resolution, and this coincides with a larger change in mean SST as ocean resolution is changed. Where the ocean resolution does make a difference, it consistently brings the storm track closer in appearance to that seen in ERA-Interim Reanalysis data. Overall, for the range of ocean model resolutions used here (1° versus 0.1°) we find that the differences in SST gradient have a small effect on the storm track strength whilst changes in absolute SST between experiments can have a larger effect. The latter affects the land–sea contrast, air–sea stability, surface latent heat flux, and the boundary layer baroclinicity in such a way as to reduce storm track activity adjacent to the western boundary in the N. Hemisphere storm tracks, but strengthens the storm track over the southern Indian Ocean. A note of caution is that the results are sensitive to the choice of storm track metric. The results are contrasted with those from a high resolution coupled simulation where the SST is smoothed for the purposes of computing air–sea fluxes, an alternative method of testing sensitivity to SST gradients. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
语种	英语
scopus关键词	boundary layer; experimental study; global climate; mesoscale meteorology; numerical model; sea surface temperature; storm track; Japan; United States
来源期刊	Climate Dynamics
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/146547
作者单位	Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, 1850 Table Mesa Drive, Boulder, CO 80305, United States; CECI UMR 5318, CNRS/CERFACS, Toulouse, France; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, United States; City College, City University of New YorkNY, United States; Climate and Global Dynamics, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305, United States
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Small R.J.,Msadek R.,Kwon Y.-O.,et al. Atmosphere surface storm track response to resolved ocean mesoscale in two sets of global climate model experiments[J],2019,52(2020-03-04).
APA	Small R.J.,Msadek R.,Kwon Y.-O.,Booth J.F.,&Zarzycki C..(2019).Atmosphere surface storm track response to resolved ocean mesoscale in two sets of global climate model experiments.Climate Dynamics,52(2020-03-04).
MLA	Small R.J.,et al."Atmosphere surface storm track response to resolved ocean mesoscale in two sets of global climate model experiments".Climate Dynamics 52.2020-03-04(2019).