Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s00382-018-4356-3 |
Confidence intervals in optimal fingerprinting | |
DelSole T.; Trenary L.; Yan X.; Tippett M.K. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 0930-7575 |
起始页码 | 4111 |
结束页码 | 4126 |
卷号 | 52期号:2020-07-08 |
英文摘要 | Optimal fingerprinting is a standard method for detecting climate changes. Among the uncertainties taken into account by this method, one is the fact that the response to climate forcing is not known exactly, but in practice is estimated from ensemble averages of model simulations. This uncertainty can be taken into account using an Error-in-Variables model (or equivalently, the Total Least Squares method), and can be expressed through confidence intervals. Unfortunately, the predominant paradigm (likelihood ratio theory) for deriving confidence intervals is not guaranteed to work because the number of parameters that are estimated in the Error-in-Variables model grows with the number of observations. This paper discusses various methods for deriving confidence intervals and shows that the widely-used intervals proposed in the seminal paper by Allen and Stott are effectively equivalent to bias-corrected intervals from likelihood ratio theory. A new, computationally simpler, method for computing these intervals is derived. Nevertheless, these confidence intervals are incorrect in the “weak-signal regime”. This conclusion does not necessarily invalidate previous detection and attribution studies because many such studies lie in the strong-signal regime, for which standard methods give correct confidence intervals. A new diagnostic is introduced to check whether or not a data set lies in the weak-signal regime. Finally, and most importantly, a bootstrap method is shown to give correct confidence intervals in both strong- and weak-signal regimes, and always produces finite confidence intervals, in contrast to the likelihood ratio method which can give unbounded intervals that do not match the actual uncertainty. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. |
英文关键词 | Detection and attribution; Optimal fingerprinting; Total least squares |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | bootstrapping; climate change; climate forcing; detection method; least squares method; uncertainty analysis |
来源期刊 | Climate Dynamics
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/146427 |
作者单位 | Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States; Program in Atmospheric, Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, United States; Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States; Department of Meteorology, Center of Excellence for Climate Change Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | DelSole T.,Trenary L.,Yan X.,et al. Confidence intervals in optimal fingerprinting[J],2019,52(2020-07-08). |
APA | DelSole T.,Trenary L.,Yan X.,&Tippett M.K..(2019).Confidence intervals in optimal fingerprinting.Climate Dynamics,52(2020-07-08). |
MLA | DelSole T.,et al."Confidence intervals in optimal fingerprinting".Climate Dynamics 52.2020-07-08(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。