Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1007/s00382-019-04673-9 |
Harmonized evaluation of daily precipitation downscaled using SDSM and WRF+WRFDA models over the Iberian Peninsula | |
González-Rojí S.J.; Wilby R.L.; Sáenz J.; Ibarra-Berastegi G. | |
发表日期 | 2019 |
ISSN | 0930-7575 |
起始页码 | 1413 |
结束页码 | 1433 |
卷号 | 53期号:2020-03-04 |
英文摘要 | There have been numerous statistical and dynamical downscaling model comparisons. However, differences in model skill can be distorted by inconsistencies in experimental set-up, inputs and output format. This paper harmonizes such factors when evaluating daily precipitation downscaled over the Iberian Peninsula by the Statistical DownScaling Model (SDSM) and two configurations of the dynamical Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) (one with data assimilation (D) and one without (N)). The ERA-Interim reanalysis at 0. 75 ∘ resolution provides common inputs for spinning-up and driving the WRF model and calibrating SDSM. WRF runs and SDSM output were evaluated against ECA&D stations, TRMM, GPCP and EOBS gridded precipitation for 2010–2014 using the same suite of diagnostics. Differences between WRF and SDSM are comparable to observational uncertainty, but the relative skill of the downscaling techniques varies with diagnostic. The SDSM ensemble mean, WRF-D and ERAI have similar correlation scores (r = 0.45 –0.7), but there were large variations amongst SDSM ensemble members (r = 0.3 –0.6). The best Linear Error in Probability Space (LEPS = 0.001 –0.007) and simulations of precipitation amount were achieved by individual members of the SDSM ensemble. However, the Brier Skill Score shows these members do not improve the prediction by ERA-Interim, whereas precipitation occurrence is reproduced best by WRF-D. Similar skill was achieved by SDSM when applied to station or gridded precipitation data. Given the greater computational demands of WRF compared with SDSM, clear statements of expected value-added are needed when applying the former to climate impacts and adaptation research. © 2019, The Author(s). |
英文关键词 | Data assimilation; Dynamical downscaling; Iberian Peninsula; Precipitation; Regional climate modelling; SDSM; Statistical downscaling; WRF |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | atmospheric modeling; climate modeling; data assimilation; downscaling; precipitation assessment; regional climate; weather forecasting; Iberian Peninsula |
来源期刊 | Climate Dynamics
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/146147 |
作者单位 | Applied Physics II Department, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Climate and Environmental Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Geography, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, United Kingdom; Joint Research Unit BEGIK, Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO), University of the Basque Country, Plentziako Itsas Estazioa, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Plentzia, Bizkaia, Spain; Fluid Mechanics and N.I. Department, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | González-Rojí S.J.,Wilby R.L.,Sáenz J.,et al. Harmonized evaluation of daily precipitation downscaled using SDSM and WRF+WRFDA models over the Iberian Peninsula[J],2019,53(2020-03-04). |
APA | González-Rojí S.J.,Wilby R.L.,Sáenz J.,&Ibarra-Berastegi G..(2019).Harmonized evaluation of daily precipitation downscaled using SDSM and WRF+WRFDA models over the Iberian Peninsula.Climate Dynamics,53(2020-03-04). |
MLA | González-Rojí S.J.,et al."Harmonized evaluation of daily precipitation downscaled using SDSM and WRF+WRFDA models over the Iberian Peninsula".Climate Dynamics 53.2020-03-04(2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。