Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111166 |
Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market | |
Özdemir Ö.; Hobbs B.F.; van Hout M.; Koutstaal P.R. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
卷号 | 137 |
英文摘要 | Policy makers across Europe have implemented renewable support policies with several policy objectives in mind. Among these are achieving ambitious renewable energy targets at the lowest cost, reducing CO2-emissions and promoting technology improvement through learning-by-doing. Using a detailed country-level model of generation markets, we address the question of how policies that subsidize renewable energy (feed-in premia and renewable portfolio standards (RPSs)) versus capacity (investment subsidies) impact the mix of renewable investments, electricity costs, renewable share, the amount of subsidies, and consumer prices in the EU electric power market in 2030 and how they interact with other policies such as the EU ETS. Our analysis shows that subsidies of energy output are cost-effective for achieving renewable energy targets in the short run, whereas policies tied to capacity installation yield more investment and might be more effective in reducing technology costs in the longer term. The difference in costs between these two policy options diminish with higher CO2-prices. Although the differences are significant, they are smaller than cost impacts of other renewable policy design features, namely the effect of not allowing EU members to meet their individual targets by trading renewable credits with other member states. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd |
英文关键词 | Capacity subsidy; Electricity markets; Energy subsidy; Renewable policy; Renewable target |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Carbon dioxide; Commerce; Cost benefit analysis; Cost effectiveness; Cost reduction; Gas emissions; Power markets; Renewable energy resources; Benefits and costs; Capacity installation; Capacity subsidy; Electric power markets; Energy subsidies; Renewable policy; Renewable portfolio standard; Technology improvement; Investments; alternative energy; cost-benefit analysis; electricity generation; electricity supply; energy policy; European Union; investment; subsidy system; Europe |
来源期刊 | Energy policy
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/124875 |
作者单位 | PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bezuidenhoutseweg 30, Den Haag, 2594 AV, Netherlands; The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Özdemir Ö.,Hobbs B.F.,van Hout M.,et al. Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market[J],2020,137. |
APA | Özdemir Ö.,Hobbs B.F.,van Hout M.,&Koutstaal P.R..(2020).Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market.Energy policy,137. |
MLA | Özdemir Ö.,et al."Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market".Energy policy 137(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。