Climate Change Data Portal
DOI | 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111333 |
Effects of allowance allocation rules on green technology investment and product pricing under the cap-and-trade mechanism | |
Yang W.; Pan Y.; Ma J.; Yang T.; Ke X. | |
发表日期 | 2020 |
ISSN | 0301-4215 |
卷号 | 139 |
英文摘要 | Grandfathering and benchmarking are two typical initial allowance allocation rules under the Cap-and-Trade (C&T) mechanism. They establish an emission limit which carbon emission generating enterprises is permitted. To avoid penalties caused by excessive emissions or to gain profits by selling saved portions of the allowance in the carbon trading market, enterprises can invest in green technology for achieving emission reduction which results in increasing cost and leads to a change in pricing strategies. This paper formulates mathematical models to quantify the optimal green technology investment and product pricing, and compare the effects of the two allocation rules on these operational decisions and total emission. The analytical results indicate that compared to benchmarking the optimal product price under the grandfathering rule is higher. Grandfathering will induce greater emission reduction. However, benchmarking is more likely to encourage enterprises to invest in green technologies for improving their energy efficiency. Moreover, the initial emission allowance under the grandfathering rule will not affect the green technology investment. However, the benchmark emission intensity will influence the green technology decision under the benchmarking rule. When choosing from two green technologies, investment in cleaner green technologies will not be authorized, in some instances, under a range of scenarios. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd |
英文关键词 | Benchmarking; Cap-and-trade mechanism; Grandfathering; Green technology investment; Initial allowance allocation rules; Product pricing |
语种 | 英语 |
scopus关键词 | Benchmarking; Carbon; Economics; Emission control; Energy efficiency; Environmental technology; Investments; Allocation rule; Cap and trade; Grandfathering; Green technology; Product pricing; Costs; benchmarking; carbon emission; emissions trading; green economy; investment; pricing policy; technological development |
来源期刊 | Energy policy
![]() |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/124793 |
作者单位 | Center for Modeling and Optimization of Complex Management Systems (CMOCMS), College of Management, Shenzhen UniversityGuangdong 518060, China; College of Economics, Shenzhen UniversityGuangdong 518060, China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Yang W.,Pan Y.,Ma J.,et al. Effects of allowance allocation rules on green technology investment and product pricing under the cap-and-trade mechanism[J],2020,139. |
APA | Yang W.,Pan Y.,Ma J.,Yang T.,&Ke X..(2020).Effects of allowance allocation rules on green technology investment and product pricing under the cap-and-trade mechanism.Energy policy,139. |
MLA | Yang W.,et al."Effects of allowance allocation rules on green technology investment and product pricing under the cap-and-trade mechanism".Energy policy 139(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Yang W.]的文章 |
[Pan Y.]的文章 |
[Ma J.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Yang W.]的文章 |
[Pan Y.]的文章 |
[Ma J.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Yang W.]的文章 |
[Pan Y.]的文章 |
[Ma J.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。