气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012
	An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services
	Mouchet M.A.; Lamarque P.; Martín-López B.; Crouzat E.; Gos P.; Byczek C.; Lavorel S.
发表日期	2014
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	28 期号:1
英文摘要	Considering the increasing uptake of the concept of "ecosystem services" in landscape management and environmental policies, it is urgent to establish a consensual framework to assess the complex relationships among ecosystem services, considering both the supply- and the demand-sides. A diversity of approaches have been proposed to evaluate ecosystem services associations, but not all methods are equivalent and methodological choices need to be made depending on the scientific and policy questions at hand, as well as the type of data available. Based on previous classifications of ecosystem service associations, we propose to characterize three broad types of associations considering the ecological (supply side) and socio-economical (demand side) aspects of ecosystem services: supply-supply, supply-demand and demand-demand. We then review quantitative methods available and propose guidelines to assess those three categories of relationships among ecosystem services and identify their explanatory variables following three steps: (i) detecting ecosystem services associations, (ii) defining bundles and (iii) identifying the explanatory variables of ecosystem services associations. For each step, strengths and weaknesses of different statistical analysis and machine learning methods are described. The proposed interdisciplinary methodological approach takes one step toward embracing such complexity of socio-ecological systems as it considers ecosystem services delivery (supply-supply), stakeholders' needs (demand-demand), and on how stakeholders can benefit from the ecosystem services delivery (supply-demand). We illustrate how such a diverse spectrum of methods may apply for land management. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
英文关键词	Bundle; Ecosystem services; Methodological framework; Synergy; Trade-off assessment
学科领域	demand-side management; ecosystem service; environmental economics; environmental policy; landscape planning; statistical analysis; sustainability; demand analysis; guideline; interdisciplinary approach; land management; machine learning; nature-society relations; quantitative analysis; synergism; trade-off; valuation
语种	英语
scopus关键词	demand-side management; ecosystem service; environmental economics; environmental policy; landscape planning; statistical analysis; sustainability; demand analysis; guideline; interdisciplinary approach; land management; machine learning; nature-society relations; quantitative analysis; synergism; trade-off; valuation
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117739
作者单位	UMR 5553 UJF-UdS-CNRS Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Grenoble, France; Georges Lemaître Center for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; Social-Ecological Systems Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; UMR 7204 MNHN-UPMC-CNRS, 55 rue Buffon, Paris, 75005, France
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Mouchet M.A.,Lamarque P.,Martín-López B.,et al. An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services[J],2014,28(1).
APA	Mouchet M.A..,Lamarque P..,Martín-López B..,Crouzat E..,Gos P..,...&Lavorel S..(2014).An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services.Global Environmental Change,28(1).
MLA	Mouchet M.A.,et al."An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services".Global Environmental Change 28.1(2014).