气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): The PISA grammar decodes diverse human-environment approaches

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.013
	The PISA grammar decodes diverse human-environment approaches
	Bousquet F.; Robbins P.; Peloquin C.; Bonato O.
发表日期	2015
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	34
英文摘要	Human-environment interactions are studied by several groups of scholars who have elaborated different approaches to describe, analyze, and explain these interactions, and eventually propose paths for management. The SETER project (Socio-Ecological Theories and Empirical Research) analyzed and compared how "flag-holders" of distinct school of thought in human-environment scholarship approached a number of empirical problems of environmental management. This paper presents the findings from this experiment by concentrating on how representatives of four schools of thought approached one of these case studies: the plant health crisis in greenhouse tomato production in south of France. Our analysis suggests that these approaches share a common conceptual vocabulary composed of four explanatory elements of change (Power, Incentives, System and Adaptation-PISA). We argue that what distinguishes these schools from one another is the syntax-the "rules" by which researchers in each of the sub-disciplines tend to organize the components of this shared conceptual vocabulary. In other words, the schools under scrutiny are differentiated not so much by what they speak of, but rather in what order, or hierarchy, do they tend to rank the importance and/or the sequence of each of these concepts in human-environment explanations. The results of our experiment support the view that communication and cooperation across the diverse human-environment traditions is possible and productive. At the same time, however, we argue that it is the distinctiveness of the claims yielded by these different schools of thought that augment our collective understanding of complex socio-ecological problems. Attempts to integrate these perspectives in one unitary approach would undermine the intellectual wealth necessary to meet the challenges of the Anthropocene. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
英文关键词	Adaptation; Disciplines; Explanatory elements of change; Power; Resilience; Social and ecological systems; System
学科领域	conceptual framework; empirical analysis; environmental education; environmental management; environmental research; greenhouse ecosystem; nature-society relations; Anthropocene; communication network; cooperative behavior; crop production; ecosystem resilience; fruit; France; Lycopersicon esculentum
语种	英语
scopus关键词	conceptual framework; empirical analysis; environmental education; environmental management; environmental research; greenhouse ecosystem; nature-society relations; Anthropocene; communication network; cooperative behavior; crop production; ecosystem resilience; fruit; France; Lycopersicon esculentum
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117483
作者单位	CIRAD, UPR GREEN, TA C-47/F, Campus international de Baillarguet, Montpellier Cedex 5, 34398, France; Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States; School of Geography and Development, The University of Arizona, United States; IRD, CBGP, Montpellier, France
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Bousquet F.,Robbins P.,Peloquin C.,et al. The PISA grammar decodes diverse human-environment approaches[J],2015,34.
APA	Bousquet F.,Robbins P.,Peloquin C.,&Bonato O..(2015).The PISA grammar decodes diverse human-environment approaches.Global Environmental Change,34.
MLA	Bousquet F.,et al."The PISA grammar decodes diverse human-environment approaches".Global Environmental Change 34(2015).