CCPortal
DOI10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation
Eriksen S.H.; Nightingale A.J.; Eakin H.
发表日期2015
ISSN0959-3780
卷号35
英文摘要This paper is motivated by a concern that adaptation and vulnerability research suffer from an under-theorization of the political mechanisms of social change and the processes that serve to reproduce vulnerability over time and space. We argue that adaptation is a socio-political process that mediates how individuals and collectives deal with multiple and concurrent environmental and social changes. We propose that applying concepts of subjectivity, knowledges and authority to the analysis of adaptation focuses attention on this socio-political process. Drawing from vulnerability, adaptation, political ecology and social theory literatures, we explain how power is reproduced or contested in adaptation practice through these three concepts. We assert that climate change adaptation processes have the potential to constitute as well as contest authority, subjectivity and knowledge, thereby opening up or closing down space for transformational adaptation. We expand on this assertion through four key propositions about how adaptation processes can be understood and outline an emergent empirical research agenda, which aims to explicitly examine these propositions in specific social and environmental contexts. We describe how the articles in this special issue are contributing to this nascent research agenda, providing an empirical basis from which to theorize the politics of adaptation. The final section concludes by describing the need for a reframing of adaptation policy, practice and analysis to engage with multiple adaptation knowledges, to question subjectivities inherent in discourses and problem understandings, and to identify how emancipatory subjectivities - and thus the potential for transformational adaptation - can be supported. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
英文关键词Authority; Climate change adaptation; Knowledges; Politics; Power; Subjectivity
学科领域authoritarianism; planning theory; political power; research work; social change; social theory; vulnerability
语种英语
scopus关键词authoritarianism; planning theory; political power; research work; social change; social theory; vulnerability
来源期刊Global Environmental Change
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117425
作者单位Department of International Environment and Development Studies (Noragric), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, Ås, 1432, Norway; Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Ulls väg 28, P.O. Box 7012, Uppsala, SE-750 07, Sweden; School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 875502, Tempe, AZ 85287-5502, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Eriksen S.H.,Nightingale A.J.,Eakin H.. Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation[J],2015,35.
APA Eriksen S.H.,Nightingale A.J.,&Eakin H..(2015).Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation.Global Environmental Change,35.
MLA Eriksen S.H.,et al."Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation".Global Environmental Change 35(2015).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Eriksen S.H.]的文章
[Nightingale A.J.]的文章
[Eakin H.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Eriksen S.H.]的文章
[Nightingale A.J.]的文章
[Eakin H.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Eriksen S.H.]的文章
[Nightingale A.J.]的文章
[Eakin H.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。