气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.05.006
	How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+
	Di Gregorio M.; Gallemore C.T.; Brockhaus M.; Fatorelli L.; Muharrom E.
发表日期	2017
ISSN	0959-3780
卷号	45
英文摘要	This paper investigates the adoption of discourses on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) across different national contexts. It draws on institutional theories to develop and test a number of hypotheses on the role of shared beliefs and politico-economic institutions in determining the discursive choices of policy actors. The results show that win–win ecological modernization discourse, embraced by powerful government agencies and international actors, dominates national REDD+ policy arenas. This discourse is challenged primarily by a minority reformist civic environmentalist discourse put forward primarily by domestic NGOs. We find evidence that countries with a less democratic political system and large-scale primary sector investments facilitate the adoption of reconciliatory ecological modernization discourse, which may not directly challenge the drivers of deforestation. Policy actors who believe in and are engaged in market-based approaches to REDD+ are much more likely to adopt ecological modernization discourses, compared to policy actors who work on community development and livelihoods issues. © 2017
英文关键词	Climate change discourse; Environmental governance; Forest; Institutions; Mitigation; Policy beliefs
学科领域	climate change; deforestation; emission control; forest; governance approach; hypothesis testing; institutional development; mitigation; nongovernmental organization; policy making; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
语种	英语
scopus关键词	climate change; deforestation; emission control; forest; governance approach; hypothesis testing; institutional development; mitigation; nongovernmental organization; policy making; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
来源期刊	Global Environmental Change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117237
作者单位	University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Sustainability Research Institute, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; Center for International Forestry Research, Jl. Cifor, Situ Gede, Bogor, 16115, Indonesia; Lafayette College, International Affairs Program, 730 High St EastonPA 18042, United States; University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences, PO. Box 27, Latokartanonkaari 700014, Finland
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Di Gregorio M.,Gallemore C.T.,Brockhaus M.,et al. How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+[J],2017,45.
APA	Di Gregorio M.,Gallemore C.T.,Brockhaus M.,Fatorelli L.,&Muharrom E..(2017).How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+.Global Environmental Change,45.
MLA	Di Gregorio M.,et al."How institutions and beliefs affect environmental discourse: Evidence from an eight-country survey on REDD+".Global Environmental Change 45(2017).