气候变化领域集成服务门户(CCPortal): Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes

CCPortal

DOI	10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.04.002
	Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes
	Fagerholm N.; Torralba M.; Moreno G.; Girardello M.; Herzog F.; Aviron S.; Burgess P.; Crous-Duran J.; Ferreiro-Domínguez N.; Graves A.; Hartel T.; Măcicăsan V.; Kay S.; Pantera A.; Varga A.; Plieninger T.
发表日期	2019
ISSN	0959-3780
起始页码	134
结束页码	147
卷号	56
英文摘要	Rural development policies in many Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries promote sustainable landscape management with the intention of providing multiple ecosystem services (ES). Yet, it remains unclear which ES benefits are perceived in different landscapes and by different people. We present an assessment of ES benefits perceived and mapped by residents (n = 2,301) across 13 multifunctional (deep rural to peri-urban) landscapes in Europe. We identify the most intensively perceived ES benefits, their spatial patterns, and the respondent and landscape characteristics that determine ES benefit perception. We find outdoor recreation, aesthetic values and social interactions are the key ES benefits at local scales. Settlement areas are ES benefit hotspots but many benefits are also related to forests, waters and mosaic landscapes. We find some ES benefits (e.g. culture and heritage values) are spatially clustered, while many others (e.g. aesthetic values) are dispersed. ES benefit perception is linked to people's relationship with and accessibility to a landscape. Our study discusses how a local perspective can contribute to the development of contextualized and socially acceptable policies for sustainable ES management. We also address conceptual confusion in ES framework and present argumentation regarding the links from services to benefits, and from benefits to different types of values. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
英文关键词	Cultural ecosystem services; Europe; Landscape characteristics; Landscape management; Landscape values; PPGIS
学科领域	accessibility; ecosystem service; environmental assessment; GIS; landscape ecology; OECD; perception; rural development; rural policy; sustainable development; Europe
语种	英语
scopus关键词	accessibility; ecosystem service; environmental assessment; GIS; landscape ecology; OECD; perception; rural development; rural policy; sustainable development; Europe
来源期刊	Global Environmental change
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://gcip.llas.ac.cn/handle/2XKMVOVA/117045
作者单位	Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, 1958, Denmark; Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland; Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, Steinstr. 19, Witzenhausen, 37213, Germany; INDEHESA, Forestry School, University of Extremadura, Plasencia, 10600, Spain; cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group and University of the Azores, Açores, Portugal; Agricultural Landscapes and Biodiversity Research Group, Agroscope, Zurich 8046, Switzerland; UMR BAGAP, INRA Agrocampus ESA, Rennes cedex, 35042, France; School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, United Kingdom; Forest Research Centre, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1349-017, Portugal; Department of Crop Production and Engineering Projects, High Polytechnic School, University of Santiago de Compostela, Lugo, 27002...
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Fagerholm N.,Torralba M.,Moreno G.,et al. Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes[J],2019,56.
APA	Fagerholm N..,Torralba M..,Moreno G..,Girardello M..,Herzog F..,...&Plieninger T..(2019).Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes.Global Environmental change,56.
MLA	Fagerholm N.,et al."Cross-site analysis of perceived ecosystem service benefits in multifunctional landscapes".Global Environmental change 56(2019).